...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy >Comparative activity of ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from Europe and the Middle East: the CLASS study.
【24h】

Comparative activity of ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from Europe and the Middle East: the CLASS study.

机译:头孢比洛对欧洲和中东地区革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌株的比较活性:CLASS研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: to assess the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators against a recent collection of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, in order to detect potential changes in susceptibility patterns, and to evaluate the Etest assay for ceftobiprole susceptibility testing. METHODS: contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates (excluding extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing isolates) from across Europe and the Middle East were collected, and their susceptibility to ceftobiprole, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, ceftazidime and cefepime was assessed using the Etest method. Quality testing [using Etest and broth microdilution (BMD)] was conducted at a central reference laboratory. RESULTS: some 5041 Gram-positive and 4026 Gram-negative isolates were included. Against Gram-positive isolates overall, ceftobiprole had the lowest MIC50 (0.5 mg/L), compared with 1 mg/L for its comparators (vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid). Against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, all four agents had a similar MIC90 (2 mg/L), but ceftobiprole had a 4-fold better MIC90 (0.5 mg/L) against methicillin-susceptible strains. Only 38 Gram-positive isolates were confirmed as ceftobiprole resistant. Among Gram-negative strains, 86.9%, 91.7% and 95.2% were susceptible to ceftobiprole, ceftazidime and cefepime, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was less susceptible to all three antimicrobials than any other Gram-negative pathogen. There was generally good agreement between local Etest results and those obtained at the reference laboratory (for ceftobiprole: 86.8% with Gram-negatives; and 94.7% with Gram-positives), as well as between results obtained by BMD and Etest methods (for ceftobiprole: 98.2% with Gram-negatives; and 98.4% with Gram-positives). CONCLUSIONS: ceftobiprole exhibits in vitro activity against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant strains. No changes in its known susceptibility profile were identified.
机译:目的:评估头孢比普利和比较剂对最近收集的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体的体外活性,以检测药敏模式的潜在变化,并评估用于头孢比普利敏感性测试的Etest测定法。方法:收集了来自欧洲和中东的当代革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性分离株(不包括产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的分离株),并评估了它们对头孢比普林,万古霉素,替考拉宁,利奈唑胺,头孢他啶和头孢吡肟的敏感性。使用Etest方法。质量测试[使用Etest和肉汤微稀释液(BMD)]在中央参考实验室进行。结果:包括约5041革兰氏阳性和4026革兰氏阴性分离株。总体而言,相对于革兰氏阳性分离株,头孢比普罗的MIC50最低(0.5 mg / L),而其比较剂(万古霉素,替考拉宁和利奈唑胺)的MIC50最低。对于耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌,所有四种药物的MIC90(2 mg / L)相似,但头孢比普罗对耐甲氧西林的菌株的MIC90(0.5 mg / L)高4倍。仅确认了38株革兰氏阳性分离株具有头孢比普利耐药性。在革兰氏阴性菌株中,分别对头孢比普利,头孢他啶和头孢吡肟敏感,分别为86.9%,91.7%和95.2%。铜绿假单胞菌比其他任何革兰氏阴性病原体对三种抗生素的敏感性都低。本地Etest结果与参考实验室获得的结果(头孢比普利:革兰氏阴性为86.8%;革兰氏阳性率为94.7%)以及BMD和Etest方法获得的结果(头孢比普利)总体上具有良好的一致性:革兰氏阴性菌98.2%;革兰氏阳性菌98.4%)。结论:头孢比普列对多种革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体,包括耐多药菌株,均具有体外活性。在其已知的药敏曲线中未发现任何变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号