...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy >Comparison of oritavancin versus vancomycin as treatments for clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 infection in a human gut model.
【24h】

Comparison of oritavancin versus vancomycin as treatments for clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 infection in a human gut model.

机译:奥利万星与万古霉素作为克林霉素诱导的难辨梭状芽胞杆菌PCR 027型人肠感染的治疗方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of oritavancin and vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) using an in vitro human gut model. METHODS: We induced CDI by instilling clindamycin into an in vitro gut model primed with pooled human faeces and C. difficile ribotype 027 spores. Oritavancin and vancomycin were instilled in separate experiments at levels equivalent to those expected in the faeces (vancomycin) of patients or levels limited by the solubility of the drug (oritavancin). RESULTS: Clindamycin exposure elicited C. difficile proliferation and high-level cytotoxin production in both experiments. Vancomycin instillation reduced vegetative C. difficile numbers within 1 day but did not affect the numbers of C. difficile spores. Oritavancin instillation markedly reduced C. difficile vegetative numbers and spores to below the limits of detection within 2 days. Cytotoxin titres in both experiments declined to the limits of detection after instillation with oritavancin or vancomycin, but did so more quickly (within 5 days) in the vancomycin experiment. Cessation of vancomycin instillation was associated with further C. difficile proliferation and high-level cytotoxin production. Conversely, toxin recrudescence was not observed following cessation of oritavancin. CONCLUSIONS: Both oritavancin and vancomycin were effective in treating clindamycin-induced CDI in a human gut model, but only oritavancin appeared active against spore forms of C. difficile. Furthermore, recurrence of high-level cytotoxin production was observed following vancomycin instillation but not oritavancin. Oritavancin therapy may be more effective in treating CDI than vancomycin, possibly because it may prevent recrudescence of C. difficile spores.
机译:目的:使用体外人肠模型比较奥利万星和万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的疗效。方法:我们通过将克林霉素滴注到体外肠道模型中诱导CDI,该模型由汇集的人粪便和艰难梭菌027型孢子组成。在单独的实验中,将奥利万星和万古霉素以与患者粪便(万古霉素)中预期的水平相等或受药物(奥利万星)溶解度限制的水平进行滴注。结果:在两个实验中,克林霉素的暴露均引起艰难梭菌的增殖和高水平细胞毒素的产生。万古霉素滴注在1天之内减少了营养艰难梭菌的数量,但不影响艰难梭菌孢子的数量。在两天内,奥利万星滴注可将艰难梭菌的营养数量和孢子显着降低至检测限以下。在两个实验中,用奥利万星或万古霉素滴注后,细胞毒素滴度均降至检测限,但在万古霉素实验中,其滴定速度更快(5天之内)。停止滴注万古霉素与进一步艰难梭菌增殖和高水平细胞毒素产生有关。相反,奥利万星停止后未观察到毒素复发。结论:奥利万星和万古霉素均可有效治疗克林霉素诱导的人肠模型中的CDI,但仅奥利万星对孢子菌艰难梭菌具有活性。此外,在万古霉素滴注后观察到高水平细胞毒素产生的复发,但奥利万星未见。奥利万星疗法可能比万古霉素更有效地治疗CDI,可能是因为它可以预防艰难梭菌孢子的复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号