首页> 外文期刊>The journal of business law >Company Voluntary Arrangements and Rescue: A New Hope and a Tudor Orthodoxy
【24h】

Company Voluntary Arrangements and Rescue: A New Hope and a Tudor Orthodoxy

机译:公司的自愿安排和救援:新的希望和都铎式的正统观念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Enterprise Act 2002 (EA 2002) has attempted to fundamentally change approaches to corporate insolvency regulation in the United Kingdom. By endeavouring to improve the administration procedure first introduced by the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the legislature has given paramount consideration to corporate rescue outcomes through the administration procedure, as originally envisaged by the Cork Committee in its seminal report of 1982. In this article it will be argued that the company voluntary arrangement (CVA) regime will be a fundamental ingredient in the post-2004 rescue culture brew. It will be argued that CVA usage will become much more prevalent as part of administration practice, and preferably as a stand-alone consensual procedure pursuant to Pt I of the IA 1986. While administration can be considered as a means to an end, that end can only be achieved through the use of appropriate restructuring processes. The CVA is one of those processes. In this article, the development of the CVA regime and its purpose, procedure, outcomes and usage are critically examined. It is argued that in prioritising administration and the rescue ethos, the legislature has returned to a fundamental concept of English insolvency law, namely equality of treatment among creditors. In placing an officeholder in charge of the key process who must consider the interests of all creditors (the administrator), the legislation takes English insolvency law full circle back to the Henrician statute that introduced collectivisation and the notion of pari passu distribution. It is the
机译:2002年企业法(EA 2002)试图从根本上改变英国公司破产监管的方法。通过努力改善1986年《破产法》(IA 1986)首次提出的管理程序,立法机关最重视通过管理程序来进行公司拯救的结果,这是软木委员会最初在1982年的开创性报告中所设想的。文章将论证说,公司的自愿安排(CVA)制度将是2004年后救援文化酝酿中的基本要素。有争议的是,CVA的使用将作为管理实践的一部分变得更加普遍,并且最好是根据IA 1986的第一部分作为独立的共识程序使用。尽管可以将管理视为达到目的的一种手段,但只有通过使用适当的重组流程才能实现。 CVA是这些过程之一。在本文中,对CVA制度的发展及其目的,程序,结果和用法进行了严格审查。有人认为,在优先考虑行政管理和救助精神时,立法机关已经恢复了英国破产法的基本概念,即债权人之间的平等待遇。在将必须考虑所有债权人(管理人)利益的关键程序的负责人安排上时,该立法将英国破产法整整追溯到引入集体化和平等分配概念的亨里克法。它是

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号