首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Use of referral reply letters for continuing medical education: a review.
【24h】

Use of referral reply letters for continuing medical education: a review.

机译:将推荐信回信用于继续医学教育的回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Referrals between generalists and specialists are a central component of the health care system and necessitate effective communication between the involved providers. Despite the high prevalence of patient referrals and their crucial role in continuity and quality of care, the medical literature demonstrates that generalists may receive little or no information about the care their patients received and little information about the appropriateness of the referral or recommendations for follow-up care. General practitioners (GPs) prefer teaching that is directly related to their clinical work rather than traditional continuing education such as formal lectures. The purpose of this review is to assess the role of referral reply letters in the continuing education of GPs. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to November 2001 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Research and Development Resource Base developed by Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, to identify studies that examined the use of referral letters for the transfer of information from specialists to referring physicians. Data on methodology, unit of analysis, main outcome measures, and results were extracted. RESULTS: Of 1,250 articles retrieved, 9 met the eligibility criteria. Three of these analyzed the content of referral reply letters and 6 described the results of surveys of general and specialty physicians. DISCUSSION: Little educational content is currently included in letters from specialists to referring GPs. GPs are receptive to the use of referral replies as sources of learning.
机译:简介:通才和专家之间的转诊是医疗保健系统的核心组成部分,需要在所涉及的提供者之间进行有效的沟通。尽管患者转诊的普遍性及其在连续性和护理质量中的关键作用,但医学文献表明,通才医生可能很少或根本没有获得有关患者所接受的护理的信息,也几乎没有关于转诊的适当性或后续建议的信息。照顾。全科医生(GPs)倾向于直接与其临床工作相关的教学,而不是传统的继续教育(如正式讲座)。这次审查的目的是评估推荐信回信在全科医生的继续教育中的作用。方法:到2001年11月,使用MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆以及由多伦多大学医学院继续教育开发的研究与开发资源库进行了全面的文献检索,以鉴定对推荐信的使用进行了研究的研究。用于从专家到转诊医师的信息转移。提取了有关方法学,分析单位,主要结果指标和结果的数据。结果:在检索到的1,250篇文章中,有9篇符合资格标准。其中三份分析了推荐信的内容,六份描述了普通医生和专科医生的调查结果。讨论:专家给推荐的全科医生的信中目​​前几乎没有教育内容。全科医生愿意将推荐信作为学习的来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号