【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We thank Mohiuddin et al for their comments about the value of our finding that vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) increases the risk of food allergy and that this appears to be independent of the risk of eczema and read with interest their confirmatory findings in their own cohort of eczematous children. We strongly support their conclusions that more work in this field is warranted, in particular that randomized controlled trials on the use of vitamin D for the prevention of food allergy would be timely. Vitamin D supplementation and food chain fortification are already universal in Europe and North America, which poses significant feasibility issues for supplementation trials in these settings. Thus there is an urgent need to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation in countries that are yet to implement routine vitamin D supplementation, food chain fortification, or both (eg, Australia). Our own findings also demonstrate the importance of using challenge-proved food allergy (as opposed to proxy measures) as the primary outcome.
机译:我们感谢Mohiuddin等人对我们发现维生素D功能不足(VDI)增加食物过敏风险的发现的价值的评论,这似乎与湿疹风险无关,并感兴趣地阅读了他们自己队列中的验证性发现湿疹的孩子。我们坚决支持他们的结论,认为在这一领域还需要做更多的工作,尤其是关于使用维生素D预防食物过敏的随机对照试验将是及时的。维生素D补充剂和食物链强化在欧洲和北美已经很普遍,这为在这些环境中进行补充剂试验带来了重大的可行性问题。因此,迫切需要在尚未实施常规维生素D补充,食物链强化或两者兼而有之的国家(例如澳大利亚)评估补充维生素D的效果。我们自己的发现还表明,使用经过挑战验证的食物过敏(相对于替代措施)作为主要结果的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号