首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Shear bond strength between a polyester-based root canal filling material and a methacrylate-based sealer with an intermediate layer of fiber-reinforced resin-based material.
【24h】

Shear bond strength between a polyester-based root canal filling material and a methacrylate-based sealer with an intermediate layer of fiber-reinforced resin-based material.

机译:聚酯基牙根管充填材料和甲基丙烯酸酯基密封剂之间的剪切粘结强度,中间层是纤维增强树脂基材料。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate the effects of an interfacial fiber-reinforced resin-based material (FRRM) application and different light-curing modes on the bond strength of a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon) to a methacrylate-based sealer (Epiphany). One hundred Resilon disks were prepared and divided into two experimental groups: 1. application of FRRM (EverStick Net) on the Resilon surface, and 2. Resilon alone (control). Following subsequent application of the Epiphany sealer, the specimens were randomly assigned into 3 subgroups according to the curing method employed: 1. chemical curing, 2. quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) light, and 3. light-emitting diode (LED). The latter two groups were further subdivided to test the effects of two different polymerization modes for each light-curing unit. Cured specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing and the failure modes were examined. The data were analyzed with three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Regardless of the curing method tested, application of FRRM at the interface significantly increased the bond strength of Resilon to Epiphany (p < 0.001). Bond strength values (MPa) were as follows (mean +/- SD): 1. chemical curing with FRRM= 3.0 +/- 0.4, without FRRM = 1.2 +/- 0.3; 2. QTH: a) standard mode with FRRM = 8.6 +/- 0.6, without FRRM = 5.5 +/- 0.9; b) ramp mode with FRRM = 8.0 +/- 1.0, without FRRM = 5.3 +/- 1.4; 3. LED: a) standard mode with FRRM = 8.8 +/- 1.1, without FRRM = 5.4 +/- 1.0; b) exponential mode with FRRM = 8.5 +/- 1.0, without FRRM = 4.6 +/- 0.6. Although light curing of specimens significantly increased the bond strength of Resilon to Epiphany (p < 0.001), the type of light-curing unit and different curing modes had no significant influence on bond strength (p = 0.852 and p = 0.776, respectively). The highest bond strength values were obtained when the FRRM was used at the interface and the sealer was light cured.
机译:研究界面纤维增强树脂基材料(FRRM)的应用和不同的光固化方式对热塑性合成聚合物基根管充填材料(Resilon)与甲基丙烯酸酯基密封剂(Epiphany)的粘结强度的影响)。准备了一百张Resilon光盘并将其分为两个实验组:1.在Resilon表面上施加FRRM(EverStick Net),以及2.单独使用Resilon(对照)。在随后应用Epiphany密封剂后,根据所采用的固化方法将样品随机分为3个亚组:1.化学固化; 2.石英-钨-卤素(QTH)光;以及3.发光二极管(LED)。 。后两个组进一步细分以测试每个光固化单元的两种不同聚合方式的效果。对固化的样品进行剪切粘结强度测试,并检查其破坏模式。使用三方差分析(ANOVA)分析数据。无论测试的固化方法如何,在界面处使用FRRM都会显着提高Resilon与主显节的粘合强度(p <0.001)。粘合强度值(MPa)如下(平均值+/- SD):1.化学固化,FRRM = 3.0 +/- 0.4,无FRRM = 1.2 +/- 0.3。 2. QTH:a)标准模式,FRRM = 8.6 +/- 0.6,无FRRM = 5.5 +/- 0.9; b)FRRM = 8.0 +/- 1.0的斜坡模式,而FRRM = 5.3 +/- 1.4; 3. LED:a)标准模式,FRRM = 8.8 +/- 1.1,无FRRM = 5.4 +/- 1.0; b)FRRM = 8.5 +/- 1.0的指数模式,而FRRM = 4.6 +/- 0.6的指数模式。尽管样品的光固化显着提高了Resilon与主显节的粘合强度(p <0.001),但是光固化单元的类型和不同的固化模式对粘合强度没有显着影响(分别为p = 0.852和p = 0.776)。当在界面处使用FRRM并使密封剂光固化时,可获得最高的粘结强度值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号