...
首页> 外文期刊>The European physical journal, B. Condensed matter physics >The Nasdap crash of April 2000: Yet another example of log-periodicity in a speculative bubble ending in a crash
【24h】

The Nasdap crash of April 2000: Yet another example of log-periodicity in a speculative bubble ending in a crash

机译:2000年4月的纳斯达普(Nasdap)崩溃:在投机泡沫中以对数周期为周期的另一个例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Nasdaq Composite fell another ≈ 10% on Friday the 14'th of April 2000 signaling the end of a remarkable speculative high-tech bubble starting in spring 1997. The closing of the Nasdaq Composite at 3321 corresponds to a total loss of over 35% since its all-time high of 5133 on the 10'th of March 2000. Similarities to the speculative bubble preceding the infamous crash of October 1929 are quite striking: the belief in what was coined a "New Economy" both in 1929 and presently made share-prices of companies with three digits price-earning ratios soar. Furthermore, we show that the largest draw downs of the Nasdaq are outliers with a confidence level better than 99% and that these two speculative bubbles, as well as others, both nicely fit into the quantitative framework proposed by the authors in a series of recent papers.
机译:纳斯达克综合指数在2000年4月14日星期五又下跌了≈10%,这标志着从1997年春季开始的明显的投机性高科技泡沫的终结。纳斯达克综合指数收于3321点,意味着总亏损超过35%。自2000年3月10日创下历史新高5133以来。与1929年10月臭名昭着的崩盘之前的投机泡沫相似,这一点令人震惊:人们对1929年和现在创造的“新经济”的信念市盈率达到三位数的公司的股价飞涨。此外,我们显示,纳斯达克的最大跌幅是离群点,其置信水平优于99%,并且这两个投机泡沫以及其他投机泡沫都非常适合作者在最近一系列的研究中提出的量化框架。文件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号