...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. >Online versus Live Delivery of Education to Pharmacists in a Large Multicentre Health Region: A Non-inferiority Assessment of Learning Outcomes
【24h】

Online versus Live Delivery of Education to Pharmacists in a Large Multicentre Health Region: A Non-inferiority Assessment of Learning Outcomes

机译:在线向大型多中心卫生区的药剂师提供在线教育与实时交付:学习成果的非劣效性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The prevalence of online modules for continuing education in the health professions has been increasing in recent years. However, the effectiveness of online modules for pharmacist learning has not been thoroughly studied.Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine if providing education to pharmacists through a self-paced enhanced online module was non-inferior to a face-to-face learning module with respect to knowledge application on the topic of postoperative insulin dosing. Secondary aims were to determine pharmacists' knowledge gain and retention, as well as their satisfaction with the modules.Methods: The participants in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group non-inferiority trial were pharmacists in a large multicentre health region. Outcomes were measured by comparing scores obtained on pre- and post-module knowledge-assessment questionnaires. A between-group difference in change on knowledge application scores of less than 25 percentage points was the predetermined non-inferiority margin.Results: A total of 74 pharmacists consented to participate, 38 randomly assigned to use the enhanced online module and 36 to attend the face-to-face learning session. For questions examining knowledge application, the mean improvement achieved by the online learning group was 26 percentage points greater than that achieved by the face-to-face learning group (95% confidence interval [CI] 25 to 27; p < 0.001). For questions testing knowledge gain, the improvement achieved by the online learning group was 7 percentage points less than that achieved by the face-to-face learning group (95% CI 2 to 12; p = 0.008). Therefore, die enhanced online module was deemed to be non-inferior to the face-to-face learning session in terms of knowledge application and knowledge gain. Insufficient data were available to analyze the secondary outcome of knowledge retention over time. Participant satisfaction was similar for the 2 groups (p = 0.62).Conclusion: The self-paced enhanced online module was non-inferior to facilitated face-to-face learning in terms of improving application and knowledge of insulin dosing. Pharmacists had similar levels of satisfaction with the 2 modes of learning.
机译:背景:近年来,用于卫生专业的继续教育的在线模块的普及率不断提高。然而,尚未全面研究在线模块对药剂师学习的有效性。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定通过自定进度的增强在线模块向药剂师提供教育是否不逊于面对面学习。人脸学习模块,涉及有关术后胰岛素剂量主题的知识应用。次要目的是确定药剂师的知识获取和保留以及对模块的满意度。方法:这项前瞻性,随机分组,平行分组的非劣效性试验的参与者为大型多中心健康地区的药剂师。通过比较模块前和模块后知识评估问卷获得的分数来衡量结果。预定的非劣质性差异在组间的知识应用得分变化之间的差异小于25个百分点。结果:共有74名药剂师同意参加,38名药剂师被随机分配使用增强的在线模块,36名药剂师参加了面对面的学习环节。对于检查知识应用的问题,在线学习组的平均改善比面对面学习组的平均改善高26个百分点(95%置信区间[CI] 25至27; p <0.001)。对于测试知识获取的问题,在线学习小组所取得的进步比面对面学习小组所取得的进步要低7个百分点(95%CI 2至12; p = 0.008)。因此,就知识应用和知识获取而言,增强型在线模块被认为不逊于面对面学习课程。没有足够的数据来分析随着时间的推移知识保留的次要结果。两组的参与者满意度相似(p = 0.62)。结论:自定进度的增强在线模块在改善胰岛素剂量的应用和知识方面不逊色于促进面对面的学习。药剂师对这两种学习方式的满意度相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号