首页> 外文期刊>The Forestry Chronicle >Evaluating the effectiveness of stakeholder advisory committee participation in forest management planning in Ontario, Canada.
【24h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of stakeholder advisory committee participation in forest management planning in Ontario, Canada.

机译:评估利益相关者咨询委员会参与加拿大安大略省森林管理规划的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study evaluates the success of Ontario's forest SACs (Local Citizens Committees), including public involvement in open houses for forest management planning using a content analysis of third party audits. Evaluations are discussed in terms of five established components of success: conflict resolution among competing interests, building of trust in institutions, incorporating public values into decisions, improving the substantive quality of decisions and informing and educating the public. Also discussed are the four established process components that facilitate success: responsiveness of the lead agency, motivation of participants, quality of deliberation among participants, and degree of public control over the process. The study has four findings. First, audits did not explicitly address components, were inconsistent, and lacked comprehensiveness, reporting on all four evaluative components that facilitate success but only four of five evaluative components of success. Consequently, our ability to determine overall success was highly constrained. Second, despite the constraints, given three of five outcome components were either not achieved, undermined or limited, and that a fourth was mixed, it appears that effectiveness of LCCs during the study period reflects more failure than success. Third, the component most associated with facilitating success, responsiveness of the lead agency, was generally high. Fourth, the key lesson is that the inability to re-frame citizens as integral participants in civic discourse may have been the weakest point in supporting the strong democracy so critical for deliberation between agencies and citizens.
机译:这项研究评估了安大略省森林SAC(地方公民委员会)的成功,包括使用第三方审核的内容分析,公众参与森林管理规划开放日。根据成功的五个既定组成部分讨论了评估:竞争利益之间的冲突解决,对机构的信任建立,将公共价值纳入决策,提高决策的实质质量以及向公众提供信息和教育。还讨论了促进成功的四个已建立的过程组件:牵头机构的响应能力,参与者的动机,参与者之间的审议质量以及对该过程的公共控制程度。该研究有四个发现。首先,审计没有明确地解决各个组成部分,前后矛盾且缺乏全面性,只报告了促进成功的所有四个评估组成部分,但仅报告了成功的五个评估组成部分中的四个。因此,我们确定总体成功的能力受到极大限制。其次,尽管有限制因素,但鉴于五个结果组成部分中的三个未实现,被破坏或受限制,并且第四个组成部分参差不齐,因此研究期间LCC的有效性似乎反映出失败多于成功。第三,牵头机构的响应能力与促进成功最相关的要素通常很高。第四,关键的教训是,无法重新组织公民成为公民话语的整体参与者,这可能是支持强大的民主的最薄弱点,而民主对于机构与公民之间的审议至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号