首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >An evaluation of the IDEEA (TM) activity monitor for estimating energy expenditure
【24h】

An evaluation of the IDEEA (TM) activity monitor for estimating energy expenditure

机译:对IDEEA(TM)活动监视器的评估,以估算能源消耗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective estimates of activity patterns and energy expenditure (EE) are important for the measurement of energy balance. The Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEEA) can estimate EE from the thirty-five postures and activities it can identify and record. The present study evaluated the IDEEA system's estimation of EE using whole-body indirect calorimetry over 24 h, and in free-living subjects using doubly-labelled water (DLW) over 14 d. EE was calculated from the IDEEA data using calibration values for RMR and EE while sitting and standing, both as estimated by the IDEEA system (IDEEA(est)) and measured by indirect calorimetry (IDEEA(meas)). Subjects were seven females and seven males, mean age 38.1 and 39.7 years, mean BMI 25.2 and 26.2 kg/m(2), respectively. The IDEEA(est) method produced a similar estimate of EE to the calorimeter (10.8 and 10.8 MJ, NS), while the IDEEA(meas) method underestimated EE (9.9 MJ, P<0.001). After removing data from static cycling, which the IDEEA was unable to identify as an activity, both the IDEEA(est) and IDEEA(meas) methods overestimated EE compared to the calorimeter (9.9 MJ, P<0.001; 9.1 MJ, P<0.05 and 8.6 MJ, respectively). Similarly, the IDEEA system overestimated EE compared to DLW over 14 d; 12.7 MJ/d (P<0.01), 11.5 MJ/d (P<0.01) and 9.5 MJ/d for the IDEEA(est), IDEEA(meas) and DLW, respectively. The IDEEA system overestimated EE both in the controlled laboratory and free-living environments. Using measured EE values for RMR, sitting and standing reduced, but did not eliminate, the error in estimated EE.
机译:活动模式和能量消耗(EE)的客观估计对于测量能量平衡很重要。能源支出和活动智能设备(IDEEA)可以从其可以识别和记录的35个姿势和活动中估算EE。本研究评估了IDEEA系统在24小时内使用全身间接量热法对EE的估计,并在14 d内使用双重标记水(DLW)对自由活动的受试者进行了评估。 EE是使用IDEEA系统(IDEEA(est))估算并通过间接量热法(IDEEA(meas))进行测量的,使用IDEEA数据使用坐着和站着时RMR和EE的校准值计算得出的。受试者分别为7名女性和7名男性,平均年龄分别为38.1和39.7岁,平均BMI为25.2和26.2 kg / m(2)。 IDEEA(est)方法得出的EE与热量计相似(10.8和10.8 MJ,NS),而IDEEA(meas)方法低估了EE(9.9 MJ,P <0.001)。从IDEEA无法识别为活动的静态循环中删除数据后,与热量计相比,IDEEA(est)和IDEEA(meas)方法均高估了EE(9.9 MJ,P <0.001; 9.1 MJ,P <0.05和8.6 MJ)。同样,IDEEA系统在14 d内比DLW高估了EE; IDEEA(est),IDEEA(meas)和DLW分别为12.7 MJ / d(P <0.01),11.5 MJ / d(P <0.01)和9.5 MJ / d。在受控实验室和自由生活环境中,IDEEA系统都高估了EE。使用RMR的测得EE值,坐姿和站立姿势可减少但不能消除估计EE中的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号