...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Evaluation of Actiheart and a 7 d activity diary for estimating free-living total and activity energy expenditure using criterion methods in 1.5- and 3-year-old children.
【24h】

Evaluation of Actiheart and a 7 d activity diary for estimating free-living total and activity energy expenditure using criterion methods in 1.5- and 3-year-old children.

机译:评估Actiheart和7天活动日记,以使用标准方法估算1.5岁和3岁儿童的自由活动总能量和活动能量消耗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate and easy-to-use methods to assess free-living energy expenditure in response to physical activity in young children are scarce. In the present study, we evaluated the capacity of (1) 4 d recordings obtained using the Actiheart (mean heart rate (mHR) and mean activity counts (mAC)) to provide assessments of total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) and (2) a 7 d activity diary to provide assessments of physical activity levels (PAL) using three sets of metabolic equivalent (MET) values (PALTorun, PALAdolph and PALAinsworth) in forty-four and thirty-one healthy Swedish children aged 1.5 and 3 years, respectively. Reference TEE, PALref and AEE were measured using criterion methods, i.e. the doubly labelled water method and indirect calorimetry. At 1.5 years of age, mHR explained 8% (P=0.006) of the variation in TEE above that explained by fat mass and fat-free mass. At 3 years of age, mHR and mAC explained 8 (P=0.004) and 6 (P=0.03)% of the variation in TEE and AEE, respectively, above that explained by fat mass and fat-free mass. At 1.5 and 3 years of age, average PALAinsworth values were 1.44 and 1.59, respectively, and not significantly different from PALref values (1.39 and 1.61, respectively). By contrast, average PALTorun (1.5 and 3 years) and PALAdolph (3 years) values were lower (P<0.05) than the corresponding PALref values. In conclusion, at both ages, Actiheart recordings explained a small but significant fraction of free-living energy expenditure above that explained by body composition variables, and our activity diary produced mean PAL values in agreement with reference values when using MET values published by Ainsworth.
机译:缺乏准确和易于使用的方法来评估幼儿对体育活动的自由活动能量消耗,因此缺乏这种方法。在本研究中,我们评估了(1)使用Actiheart获得的4 d记录的容量(平均心率(mHR)和平均活动计数(mAC)),以提供总能量消耗(TEE)和活动能量消耗( AEE)和(2)7天活动日记,以使用三组代谢当量(MET)值(PAL Torun ,PAL Adolph 和PAL Ainsworth )分别对年龄分别为1.5岁和3岁的瑞典健康儿童的44名和31名进行了测试。参考TEE,PAL ref 和AEE使用标准方法(即双标水法和间接量热法)进行测量。在1.5岁时,mHR解释了TEE变化的8%(P = 0.006),高于脂肪量和无脂肪量所解释的值。在3岁时,mHR和mAC分别解释了TEE和AEE变化的8%(P = 0.004)和6%(P = 0.03)%,高于脂肪量和无脂肪量的解释。在1.5岁和3岁时,平均PAL Ainsworth 值分别为1.44和1.59,与PAL ref 值(分别为1.39和1.61)没有显着差异。相比之下,平均PAL Torun (1.5和3年)和PAL Adolph (3年)的值低于(P <0.05)相应的PAL ref < / sub>值。总之,在两个年龄段,Actiheart记录都解释了自由活动能量消耗的一小部分,但很大一部分高于身体成分变量所解释的水平,并且当使用Ainsworth发布的MET值时,我们的活动日记产生的PAL平均值与参考值一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号