首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Assessment of body composition in Indian adults: comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and isotope dilution technique
【24h】

Assessment of body composition in Indian adults: comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and isotope dilution technique

机译:印度成年人身体成分评估:双能X射线吸收法和同位素稀释技术之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and isotope dilution technique have been used as reference methods to validate the estimates of body composition by simple field techniques; however, very few studies have compared these two methods. We compared the estimates of body composition by DXA and isotope dilution (O-18) technique in apparently healthy Indian men and women (aged 19-70 years, n 152, 48% men) with a wide range of BMI (14-40 kg/m(2)). Isotopic enrichment was assessed by isotope ratio mass spectroscopy. The agreement between the estimates of body composition measured by the two techniques was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The mean age and BMI were 37 (SD 15) years and 23.3 (SD 5.1) kg/m(2), respectively, for men and 37 (SD 14) years and 24.1 (SD 5.8) kg/m(2), respectively, for women. The estimates of fat-free mass were higher by about 7 (95% CI 6, 9)%, those of fat mass were lower by about 21 (95% CI -18, -23) %, and those of body fat percentage (BF%) were lower by about 7.4 (95% CI -8.2, -6.6)% as obtained by DXA compared with the isotope dilution technique. The Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement that indicated poor agreement between the methods. The bias in the estimates of BF% was higher at the lower values of BF%. Thus, the two commonly used reference methods showed substantial differences in the estimates of body composition with wide limits of agreement. As the estimates of body composition are method-dependent, the two methods cannot be used interchangeably
机译:双能X射线吸收法(DXA)和同位素稀释技术已被用作参考方法,以通过简单的现场技术验证对人体成分的估计。但是,很少有研究比较这两种方法。我们比较了DXA和同位素稀释(O-18)技术对明显健康的印度男性和女性(年龄在19-70岁,n 152,48%的男性)和广泛的BMI(14-40 kg)的身体成分估计值/ m(2))。通过同位素比质谱法评估同位素富集。通过Bland-Altman方法评估通过两种技术测得的身体成分估计值之间的一致性。男性平均年龄和BMI分别为37(SD 15)岁和23.3(SD 5.1)kg / m(2),分别为37岁(SD 14)和24.1(SD 5.8)kg / m(2)。 , 女用。无脂肪量的估计值高约7(95%CI 6,9)%,脂肪量的估计值低约21(95%CI -18,-23)%,而体脂百分比的估计值(与同位素稀释技术相比,通过DXA获得的BF%)降低了约7.4(95%CI -8.2,-6.6)%。 Bland-Altman分析显示出一致的局限性,表明方法之间的一致性差。 BF%的估计值偏低,而BF%的值偏低。因此,这两种常用的参考方法显示出人体成分的估计存在很大差异,且具有广泛的一致性。由于身体成分的估计取决于方法,因此这两种方法不能互换使用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号