首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right?
【24h】

Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right?

机译:初级保健中的踝肱指数测量:我们做对了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The reference standard for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease in primary care is the ankle brachial index (ABI). Various methods to measure ankle and brachial blood pressures and to calculate the index are described. AIM: To compare the ABI measurements performed in primary care with those performed in the vascular laboratory. Furthermore, an inventory was made of methods used to determine the ABI in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care practice and outpatient clinic. METHOD: Consecutive patients suspected of peripheral arterial disease based on ABI assessment in primary care practices were included. The ABI measurements were repeated in the vascular laboratory. Referring GPs were interviewed about method of measurement and calculation of the index. From each patient the leg with the lower ABI was used for analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients of 45 primary care practices with a mean ABI of 0.80 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.27) were included. The mean ABI as measured in the vascular laboratory was 0.82 (SD = 0.26). A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated great variability between ABI measurements in primary care practice and the vascular laboratory. Both method of blood pressure measurements and method of calculating the ABI differed greatly between primary care practices. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the ABI is often not correctly determined in primary care practice. This phenomenon seems to be due to inaccurate methods for both blood pressure measurements and calculation of the index. A guideline for determining the ABI with a hand-held Doppler, and a training programme seem necessary.
机译:背景:在基层医疗机构中诊断外周动脉疾病的参考标准是踝臂指数(ABI)。描述了测量踝关节和肱动脉血压以及计算指数的各种方法。目的:将在初级保健中进行的ABI测量与在血管实验室进行的ABI测量进行比较。此外,对用于确定初级保健中ABI的方法进行了清点。研究设计:横断面研究。地点:初级保健实践和门诊诊所。方法:包括在基础护理实践中根据ABI评估连续疑似外周动脉疾病的患者。在血管实验室中重复进行ABI测量。推荐GP接受了有关指标的测量和计算方法的采访。对于每位患者,使用具有较低ABI的腿进行分析。结果:包括45个初级保健实践中的99名患者,平均ABI为0.80(标准差[SD] = 0.27)。在血管实验室中测得的平均ABI为0.82(SD = 0.26)。 Bland-Altman图显示了初级保健实践和血管实验室之间的ABI测量值之间存在很大差异。初级保健实践之间的血压测量方法和ABI的计算方法都大不相同。结论:这项研究表明在初级保健实践中常常不能正确确定ABI。这种现象似乎是由于血压测量和指数计算方法不正确造成的。用手持式多普勒仪确定ABI的指南和培训计划似乎很必要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号