首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Patient experience and the role of postgraduate GP training: A cross-sectional analysis of national patient survey data in England
【24h】

Patient experience and the role of postgraduate GP training: A cross-sectional analysis of national patient survey data in England

机译:患者经验和研究生GP培训的作用:英格兰国家患者调查数据的横断面分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Quality indicators for primary care focus predominantly on the public health model and organisational measures. Patient experience is an important dimension of quality. Accreditation for GP training practices requires demonstration of a series of attributes including patient-centred care. Aim: The national GP Patient Survey (GPPS) was used to determine the characteristics of general practices scoring highly in responses relating to the professional skills and characteristics of doctors. Specifically, to determine whether active participation in postgraduate GP training was associated with more positive experiences of care. Design and setting: Retrospective cross-sectional study in general practices in England. Method: Data were obtained from the national QOF dataset for England, 2011/12 (8164 general practices); the GPPS in 2012 (2.7?million questionnaires in England; response rate 36%); general practice and demographic characteristics. Sensitivity analyses included local data validated by practice inspections. Outcome measures: multilevel regression models adjusted for clustering. Results: GP training practice status (29% of practices) was a significant predictor of positive GPPS responses to all questions in the 'doctor care' (n = 6) and 'overall satisfaction' (n = 2) domains but not to any of the 'nurse care' or 'out-of-hours' domain questions. The findings were supported by the sensitivity analyses. Other positive determinants were: smaller practice and individual GP list sizes, more older patients, lower social deprivation and fewer ethnic minority patients. Conclusion: Based on GPPS responses, doctors in GP training practices appeared to offer more patient-centred care with patients reporting more positively on attributes of doctors such as 'listening' or 'care and concern'.
机译:背景:初级保健的质量指标主要集中在公共卫生模型和组织措施上。患者的经验是质量的重要方面。全科医生培训实践的认证要求证明一系列属性,包括以患者为中心的护理。目的:使用国家全科医生患者调查(GPPS)来确定在与医生的专业技能和特征有关的回答中得分很高的一般做法的特征。具体而言,要确定积极参与研究生GP培训是否与更积极的护理经历相关联。设计与设置:回顾性横断面研究,在英国进行。方法:数据来自英格兰2011/12年度国家QOF数据集(8164个通用做法); 2012年的GPPS(在英格兰有270万份问卷;答复率为36%);一般做法和人口特征。敏感性分析包括通过实践检查验证的本地数据。成果指标:针对聚类调整的多层回归模型。结果:GP培训实践状态(占实践的29%)是GPPS对“医生护理”(n = 6)和“总体满意度”(n = 2)域中所有问题的积极响应的重要预测指标,但对以下任何方面均无影响“护士护理”或“非工作时间”领域的问题。敏感性分析支持了该发现。其他积极的决定因素是:较小的实践和个人GP列表大小,更多的老年患者,较低的社会剥夺和较少的少数民族患者。结论:根据GPPS的回答,医生在GP培训实践中似乎提供了更多以患者为中心的护理,而患者对医生的“听”或“关怀和关心”等属性的报告更为积极。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号