首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Debate & Analysis: Advance care planning: An unsuitable subject for QOF?
【24h】

Debate & Analysis: Advance care planning: An unsuitable subject for QOF?

机译:辩论与分析:预先护理计划:QOF不合适的主题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Allowing individuals to retain control over their health care even after losing mental capacity, advance care planning (ACP) can be seen as the ultimate expression of patient choice and empowerment. Evidence of the extent to which medicine has turned its back on paternalism, ACP has proved an attractive concept for healthcare policy makers, and recent years have seen increasing development of related professional guidance. Recognition in UK legislation in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 has further strengthened interest. Promotional initiatives for ACP, particularly in primary care, have focused on increasing its use, with one guideline advocating integration into the Quality and Outcomes Framework as a means of establishing ACP as a 'routine' part of care. The suggestion that something as complex and sensitive as ACP could be dealt with in a similarly routine and structured way to blood pressure monitoring or cardiovascular risk assessment seems surprising; certainly the possibility should lead to detailed examination of the implications of incentivisation of this process, as well as perhaps to a degree of re-examination of the concept itself.
机译:允许个人即使在失去智力后仍能保持对医疗保健的控制权,预先护理计划(ACP)可被视为患者选择和授权的最终体现。关于医学在多大程度上不再依赖家长式管理的证据,ACP已被证明对医疗保健政策制定者是一个有吸引力的概念,并且近年来,相关专业指南的发展也在增加。 2005年《心理能力法》对英国立法的认可进一步增强了人们的兴趣。 ACP的促销举措,特别是在初级保健中,已集中于增加其使用,其中一项准则主张将其整合到质量和结果框架中,以此作为将ACP确立为护理“常规”部分的一种手段。有人提出以血压监测或心血管风险评估的类似常规和结构化方式处理像ACP这样复杂而敏感的事情的建议似乎令人惊讶;当然,这种可能性应该导致对这一过程的激励作用的含义进行详细研究,也许还可以对概念本身进行一定程度的重新检验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号