首页> 外文期刊>The European respiratory journal : >IDSA/ATS minor criteria aid pre-intensive care unit resuscitation in severe community-acquired pneumonia.
【24h】

IDSA/ATS minor criteria aid pre-intensive care unit resuscitation in severe community-acquired pneumonia.

机译:IDSA / ATS次要标准有助于重症社区获得性肺炎的重症监护病房复苏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effect of employing severity scores to identify severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) cases for early aggressive resuscitation is unknown. Optimising pre-intensive care unit (ICU) care may improve outcomes in patients at risk of SCAP. We conducted a before-and-after study of patients classified into control and intervention groups (January 2004 to December 2007 and January 2008 to December 2010, respectively). Our intervention was two-pronged, using the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) minor criteria to identify SCAP for aggressive emergency department resuscitation. Patients with SCAP, defined as those with three or more IDSA/ATS minor criteria, were targeted. Differences in mortality, triage and compliance with emergency department resuscitation were compared between the groups. The hospital mortality rate was lower in the intervention versus the control group (5.7% versus 23.8%, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the intervention group was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.67). ICU admission rates decreased from 52.9% to 38.6% (p=0.008) and inappropriately delayed ICU admissions decreased from 32.0% to 14.8% (p<0.001). There was increased compliance with the aggressive resuscitation protocol after the intervention. A combined intervention, using a pneumonia score to identify those at risk of SCAP early and an aggressive pre-ICU resuscitation protocol may reduce mortality and ICU admissions.
机译:使用严重程度评分来识别严重的社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)病例以进行早期积极复苏的效果尚不清楚。优化重症监护病房(ICU)护理可能会改善有SCAP风险的患者的预后。我们对分为对照组和干预组(分别为2004年1月至2007年12月和2008年1月至2010年12月)的患者进行了前后研究。我们的干预措施是两方面的,使用美国2007年传染病学会(IDSA)/美国胸科学会(ATS)的次要标准来确定SCAP用于急诊急救复苏。 SCAP患者定义为具有三个或更多IDSA / ATS次要标准的患者。比较两组之间的死亡率,分类和急诊复苏的依从性。干预组的医院死亡率低于对照组(5.7%比23.8%,p <0.001)。在多变量分析中,干预组的死亡率较低(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.09-0.67)。 ICU入院率从52.9%降至38.6%(p = 0.008),不适当延迟的ICU入院率从32.0%降至14.8%(p <0.001)。干预后,对积极复苏方案的依从性增加。联合干预,使用肺炎评分来及早发现有SCAP风险的患者,以及积极的ICU复苏前方案可降低死亡率和ICU入院率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号