...
首页> 外文期刊>The European Journal of Neuroscience >How does the brain mediate interpretation of incongruent auditory emotions? The neural response to prosody in the presence of conflicting lexico-semantic cues.
【24h】

How does the brain mediate interpretation of incongruent auditory emotions? The neural response to prosody in the presence of conflicting lexico-semantic cues.

机译:大脑如何介导不一致的听觉情感的解释?存在矛盾的语义语义提示时对韵律的神经反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We frequently encounter conflicting emotion cues. This study examined how the neural response to emotional prosody differed in the presence of congruent and incongruent lexico-semantic cues. Two hypotheses were assessed: (i) decoding emotional prosody with conflicting lexico-semantic cues would activate brain regions associated with cognitive conflict (anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) or (ii) the increased attentional load of incongruent cues would modulate the activity of regions that decode emotional prosody (right lateral temporal cortex). While the participants indicated the emotion conveyed by prosody, functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired on a 3T scanner using blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast. Using SPM5, the response to congruent cues was contrasted with that to emotional prosody alone, as was the response to incongruent lexico-semantic cues (for the 'cognitive conflict' hypothesis). The right lateral temporal lobe region of interest analyses examined modulation of activity in this brain region between these two contrasts (for the 'prosody cortex' hypothesis). Dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex activity was not observed, and neither was attentional modulation of activity in right lateral temporal cortex activity. However, decoding emotional prosody with incongruent lexico-semantic cues was strongly associated with left inferior frontal gyrus activity. This specialist form of conflict is therefore not processed by the brain using the same neural resources as non-affective cognitive conflict and neither can it be handled by associated sensory cortex alone. The recruitment of inferior frontal cortex may indicate increased semantic processing demands but other contributory functions of this region should be explored.
机译:我们经常遇到矛盾的情绪暗示。这项研究检查了在存在全称和不一致的词汇语义提示时,对情绪韵律的神经反应如何不同。评估了两个假设:(i)用矛盾的词汇语义线索对情绪韵律进行解码将激活与认知冲突相关的大脑区域(前扣带和背外侧前额叶皮层),或(ii)不一致线索增加的注意力负荷将调节区域的活动解码情绪韵律(右侧颞叶皮层)。在参与者表明韵律传达的情绪的同时,功能性磁共振成像数据是在3T扫描仪上使用血液氧合水平相关的对比度获取的。使用SPM5,对全等线索的响应与仅对情绪韵律的响应形成对比,对不全词汇语义线索的响应(针对“认知冲突”假设)也是如此。感兴趣的右侧颞叶区域分析检查了这两种对比之间(针对“韵律皮层”假说)该大脑区域活动的调节。没有观察到背外侧前额叶和扣带回前皮的活动,也没有观察到右侧颞叶皮下活动的注意调节活动。但是,用不一致的词汇语义线索来解码情绪韵律与左下额叶回活动密切相关。因此,这种特殊形式的冲突不能由大脑使用与非情感性认知冲突相同的神经资源来处理,也不能仅通过相关的感觉皮层来处理。下额叶皮层的募集可能表明语义处理需求增加,但应探索该区域的其他贡献功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号