首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab and other biological treatments in ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab and other biological treatments in ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

机译:生物仿制药英夫利昔单抗和其他生物治疗在强直性脊柱炎中的比较疗效和安全性:系统文献综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of inflix-imab-biosimilar with other biological drugs for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods Systematic literature review for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with adalimumab, etanercept, go-limumab, infliximab and infliximab-biosimilar in AS was performed and indirect meta-analysis (Bayesian mixed treatment comparison) was carried out. The proportion of patients reaching 20 % improvement by the assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria (ASAS20) at weeks 12 and 24 was used as efficacy end-points, and the occurrence of serious adverse events at week 24 was applied to compare the safety of the biologicals. Results Altogether, 13 RCTs, identified by the systematic literature search, were included in the analysis. Results on the ASAS20 efficacy endpoint were reported for week 12 in 12 RCTs involving 2,395 patients, and for week 24 in 5 RCTs comprising 1,337 patients. All the five biological agents proved to be significantly superior to placebo. Infliximab showed the highest odds ratio (OR) of 7.2 (95 % CI 3.68-13.19) compared to placebo, followed by infliximab-biosimilar with OR 6.25 (95 % CI 2.55-13.14), both assessed at week 24. No significant difference was found between infliximab-biosimilar and other biological treatments regarding their efficacy and safety. Conclusions This is the first study which includes a biosimilar drug in the meta-analysis of biological treatments in AS. The results have proven the similar efficacy and safety profile of infliximab-biosimilar treatment compared to other biologicals.
机译:目的比较英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药与其他生物药物治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)的疗效和安全性。方法:系统文献回顾了AS患者中使用阿达木单抗,依那西普,戈利木单抗,英夫利昔单抗和英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的随机对照试验(RCT),并进行了间接荟萃分析(贝叶斯混合治疗比较)。通过国际脊柱关节炎国际评估标准(ASAS20)在第12周和第24周评估达到20%改善的患者比例作为疗效终点,并在第24周使用严重不良事件的发生率比较安全性生物学。结果分析中共包括13篇通过系统文献检索确定的RCT。在12项涉及2395例患者的RCT中,第12周报告了ASAS20疗效终点的结果;在包括1337例患者的5项RCT中,第24周报告了ASAS20疗效终点的结果。这五种生物制剂均被证明明显优于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,英夫利昔单抗的最高比值比(OR)为7.2(95%CI 3.68-13.19),其次是英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的OR 6.25(95%CI 2.55-13.14),两者均在第24周进行了评估。无显着差异。在英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药和其他生物治疗之间发现了有关它们的功效和安全性。结论这是首次将生物仿制药纳入AS生物学治疗的荟萃分析的研究。结果证明了英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药与其他生物制剂相比具有相似的功效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号