首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Social Psychology >Implications of free will beliefs for basic theory and societal benefit: Critique and implications for social psychology
【24h】

Implications of free will beliefs for basic theory and societal benefit: Critique and implications for social psychology

机译:自由意志信仰对基本理论和社会利益的影响:批评及其对社会心理学的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Greater belief in free will is associated with greater empathy towards the working poor, support for social mobility, greater desire for socio-economic equality, and less belief that poor people are fated to live in poverty. We found no sign that belief in free will led to prejudice or discrimination against poor people or undercut justice. These findings from an online survey flatly contradict the claims made by James Miles (2013). Belief in a just world did produce many of the patterns Miles attributed to belief in free will. We also question the reasoning and the strength of the purported evidence in his article, and we recommend that future writers on the topic should cultivate cautious, open-minded consideration of competing views. Miles' article is a useful reminder that to some writers, the topic of free will elicits strong emotional reactions.
机译:对自由意志的更大信念与对工作中的穷人的更大同情,对社会流动的支持,对社会经济平等的更大渴望以及对穷人注定要生活在贫困中的更少信念有关。我们发现没有迹象表明对自由的信仰会导致对穷人的偏见或歧视或削弱司法公正。在线调查的这些发现与詹姆斯·迈尔斯(James Miles)(2013)提出的主张完全矛盾。对公正世界的信仰确实产生了许多将迈尔斯归因于对自由意志的信仰的模式。我们还质疑他的文章中所称证据的推理和依据,我们建议该主题的未来作者应对审慎的观点进行谨慎,开放的考虑。迈尔斯(Miles)的文章提醒人们,对于一些作家来说,自由这一话题会引起强烈的情感反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号