...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison.
【24h】

Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison.

机译:文拉法辛和帕罗西汀可治疗难治性抑郁症。双盲,随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients fail to respond to initial antidepressant therapy, which suggests a need for more effective drugs. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and paroxetine in 122 patients with non-chronic treatment-resistant depression. METHOD: In-patients or out-patients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for major depression in evolution for less than eight months, having a baseline HAM-D score > or = 18 and a HAM-D Item 3 score < 3 were eligible. Patients were required to have a history of resistance to two previous antidepressant treatments and a CGI improvement score of 3 at the beginning of treatment. Doses were adjusted to 200-300 mg/day for venlafaxine and 30-40 mg/day for paroxetine. RESULTS: For the observed-case analysis, the response rate was 51.9% for venlafaxine and 32.7% for paroxetine (P = 0.044), and a remission was achieved in 42.3% of venlafaxine-treated and 20.0% of paroxetine-treated patients (P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine showed some evidence of superiority to paroxetine in this difficult-to-treat patient population.
机译:背景:大约三分之一的患者对最初的抗抑郁药治疗无效,这表明需要更有效的药物。目的:比较文拉法辛和帕罗西汀在122例非慢性耐药性抑郁症患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:符合DSM-III-R标准的严重抑郁症发展少于8个月,基线HAM-D得分>或= 18并且HAM-D项目3得分<3的住院或门诊患者。要求患者对既往的两种抗抑郁药都有抗药史,并且在治疗开始时的CGI改善评分为3。文拉法辛的剂量调整为200-300 mg /天,帕罗西汀的剂量调整为30-40 mg /天。结果:对于观察病例分析,文拉法辛的缓解率为51.9%,帕罗西汀的缓解率为32.7%(P = 0.044),文拉法辛治疗的患者和帕罗西汀治疗的患者的缓解率分别为42.3%和20.0%(P = 0.01)。治疗组之间的不良反应发生率相当。结论:文拉法辛显示出一些证据表明,在这一难以治疗的患者人群中,文拉法辛优于帕罗西汀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号