首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Counterpoint: are donors after circulatory death really dead, and does it matter? No and not really.
【24h】

Counterpoint: are donors after circulatory death really dead, and does it matter? No and not really.

机译:观点:循环死亡后的捐献者真的死亡了,这有关系吗?不,不是。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From at least 1968 until the present, prevailing ethical thinking about organ donation has been shaped by the perceived need to conform to the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), which states that vital organs may be removed from patients only after they have been declared dead. Elsewhere, we have argued against the fiction that individuals diagnosed as brain dead are dead because they maintain an extensive range of biologic functioning of the organism as a whole.13 The determination of death in the case of donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD) relies on a more subtle fudging of the truth: Although imminently dying, donors under DCDD protocols are not known to be dead at the time that organs are procured.
机译:从至少1968年到现在,有关器官捐赠的普遍伦理学思想受到人们对遵守所谓的“死者捐赠者规则”(DDR)的认识的影响,该规则规定,只有在患者接受器官捐赠后,才能从患者身上摘除重要器官。宣布死亡。在其他地方,我们反对这样的假说:被诊断为脑死亡的人之所以死亡,是因为他们维持了整个有机体的广泛生物学功能。13在循环确定死亡(DCDD)后确定捐赠情况下的死亡确定)依赖于对事实的更微妙的欺骗:尽管濒临死亡,但尚不知道根据DCDD协议购买的捐献者在器官采购时已经死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号