首页> 外文期刊>The Breast : >Breast cancer in Latin America: experts perceptions compared with medical care standards.
【24h】

Breast cancer in Latin America: experts perceptions compared with medical care standards.

机译:拉丁美洲的乳腺癌:专家的看法与医疗标准的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. METHODS: Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. Results: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. CONCLUSION: All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations.
机译:背景:BCRF II研究对12个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家的被认为是乳腺癌的医疗标准(MCS)的规范,建议和指南进行了系统的回顾。提出了来自BCRF I调查数据中有关早期检测和诊断的三个关键问题,以识别与MCS相关的实施实践模式。方法:从12个拉丁美洲和加勒比海国家的政府卫生当局,癌症机构以及国家科学和专业协会要求获得与MCS相关的信息。来自各个国家的乳腺癌专家对收到的文件进行了审查。对来自BCRF I调查中有关早期发现和诊断的三个关键调查问题进行了重新处理,以提供与现有MCS实施实践相关的信息。结果:包括在BCRF II研究中的所有国家/地区均具有医疗标准(MCS),无论该标准是由政府当局,国家专业或科学协会,癌症研究所发布还是采用国际MCS。专家报告说,国家级和中心级的实践模式不同。总体而言,有85%的专家报告说,在国家/地区,只有不到50%的无症状女性接受了乳房X线摄影,而在中心/地区则只有43%。对于乳腺癌的诊断怀疑,有80%的专家认为国家/地区的诊断怀疑来自患者,而中心级的诊断是50%。在国家/地区级别,大约30%的患者等待了3个月以上的诊断,而在中心级别,则为7%。结论:研究中的所有拉丁美洲和加勒比海国家都报告了类似的MCS用于乳腺癌护理。所报告的在国家一级与中心一级实行的护理之间的差异表明,挑战不在于生成新的MCS,而在于实施政策和控制机制以符合现有的MCS,以确保其对所有人群的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号