...
【24h】

REVIEW And OUTLOOK

机译:回顾与展望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Regulators in California have published a notice of intent to list bisphenol A (BPA) as a developmental toxicant under the state’s Proposition 65 (Prop 65) law. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed the listing as part of the state law that requires labeling of products deemed to be carcinogenic or harmful to reproductive health. However, industry says OEHHA’s decision conflicts with prior state findings on BPA. “The weight of scientific evidence does not support OEHHA’s intention to list BPA under Proposition 65, and this action sharply contrasts with the results of the earlier assessment conducted by California’s own scientific experts,” says Steve Hentges, head of ACC’s polycarbonate group. “Based on their own detailed evaluation, the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee ... had unanimously concluded in July of 2009 that BPA does not satisfy the listing criteria for developmental toxicants under Proposition 65,” Hentges says.
机译:加利福尼亚州的监管机构已经发布了一份意向书,意在将双酚A(BPA)列为该州的65号提案(Prop 65)法律中的发展性有毒物质。加利福尼亚州环境健康危害评估办公室(OEHHA)提议将该清单列为州法律的一部分,该州法律要求对被认为具有致癌性或对生殖健康有害的产品进行标签。但是,业内人士表示,OEHHA的决定与先前关于BPA的州调查结果相冲突。 ACC聚碳酸酯事业部负责人史蒂夫·亨特斯(Steve Hentges)表示:“科学证据的重要性不支持OEHHA将BPA列入65号提案的意图,这一举动与加州自己的科学专家此前进行的评估结果形成鲜明对比。”亨特斯说:“根据他们自己的详细评估,发育和生殖毒物鉴定委员会...于2009年7月一致得出结论,双酚A不满足第65号提案中关于发育毒物的列出标准。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号