首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Treatment of chronic, intractable pain with a conventional implantable pulse generator: A meta-analysis of 4 clinical studies
【24h】

Treatment of chronic, intractable pain with a conventional implantable pulse generator: A meta-analysis of 4 clinical studies

机译:传统的植入式脉冲发生器治疗慢性顽固性疼痛:对4项临床研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To provide further short-term (6 mo) and long-term (1 y) evidence for the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a conventional implantable pulse generator in the management of chronic, intractable pain. MATERIALS AND Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter studies that collected outcome data from patients implanted with SCS to treat chronic pain of the trunk and/or limbs (Genesis IPG system). Two of these were conducted as long-term studies lasting 1 year, and 2 as shorter term studies lasting 6 months. A total of 300 patients from 28 investigational sites were prospectively evaluated for efficacy at 3 months after implant and safety at 6 months after implant. None of the sites participated in more than one study. Outcome measures included patient-reported percent of pain relief, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, pain evaluation (0 to 10 rating), pain relief rating, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale, the Short Form-36, and the total number of adverse events (AEs). Results: At 3 months after implantation of the permanent system, 75.4% of the patients (190/252) reported a 50% or greater pain relief as determined by the patient-reported degree of pain relief. Similarly, assessment of patient satisfaction with SCS therapy showed that 86.1% of patients (217/252) in all 4 studies were satisfied or very satisfied with the therapy at 3 months. In the 2 long-term studies, 80.9% of patients (140/173) were satisfied or very satisfied with the therapy at the 1-year evaluation point. Quality-of-life (QoL) data indicated that at 3 months after implant, 77.8% of patients (196/252) reported QoL as improved or greatly improved. Similarly, QoL was improved or greatly improved for 74.0% patients in the long-term study at 1 year (128/173). In the safety analysis, AEs were reviewed for all 4 studies. A total of 190 AEs were reported in 117 of 300 patients during all studies. Conclusions: This analysis provides further evidence of the safety and effectiveness of SCS in treating chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs. Specifically, it underscores a high level of effectiveness and acceptable safety concerns in the use of nonrechargeable SCS devices.
机译:目的:提供进一步的短期(6 mo)和长期(1 y)证据,证明使用常规植入式脉冲发生器对脊髓进行刺激(SCS)可治疗慢性顽固性疼痛。材料与方法:我们对4项前瞻性,多中心研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究收集了植入SCS来治疗躯干和/或四肢慢性疼痛的患者的结果数据(Genesis IPG系统)。其中有两项是为期一年的长期研究,有两项是为期6个月的短期研究。前瞻性评估了来自28个研究地点的300位患者的植入后3个月的疗效和植入后6个月的安全性。没有一个站点参与一项以上的研究。结果指标包括患者报告的缓解疼痛百分比,患者满意度,生活质量改善,疼痛评估(0到10级),缓解疼痛评分,麦吉尔疼痛问卷简表,视觉模拟量表,Short Form-36和不良事件(AE)总数。结果:永久性系统植入后3个月,有75.4%的患者(190/252)报告了50%或更高的疼痛缓解,这取决于患者报告的疼痛缓解程度。同样,对SCS治疗的患者满意度评估表明,所有4项研究中有86.1%的患者(217/252)在3个月时对该治疗感到满意或非常满意。在2项长期研究中,在1年评估点上有80.9%的患者(140/173)对该疗法感到满意或非常满意。生活质量(QoL)数据表明,植入后3个月,有77.8%的患者(196/252)报告QoL改善或大大改善。同样,在1年的长期研究中,有74.0%的患者的QoL得到改善或大大改善(128/173)。在安全性分析中,对所有4项研究的AE进行了审查。在所有研究中,300例患者中的117例共报告了190例AE。结论:该分析为SCS治疗躯干和/或四肢慢性顽固性疼痛的安全性和有效性提供了进一步的证据。特别是,它强调了在使用不可充电SCS设备时的高水平有效性和可接受的安全问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号