首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Local pain and spreading hyperalgesia induced by intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor are not reduced by local anesthesia of the muscle.
【24h】

Local pain and spreading hyperalgesia induced by intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor are not reduced by local anesthesia of the muscle.

机译:肌肉局部麻醉并不能减轻肌肉注射神经生长因子引起的局部疼痛和痛觉过敏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Injections with local anesthesia for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes are common clinical practice. This double-blind placebo controlled study explores the rational of local anesthetic blocks for the detection of muscle pain as the primary generator in spreading hyperalgesic conditions. METHODS: Experimental muscle pain was induced by injections of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the left and right supraspinatus muscle of 11 healthy volunteers. One day later ropivacaine and saline were administered with ultrasound guidance in the left or right supraspinatus muscle in a randomized double-blind manner. Assessments before NGF, day 1 (before and after ropivacaine/saline), and day 7 included: visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during shoulder shrugging, time until exercise interruption owing to pain, cutaneous pain sensitivity, pressure pain thresholds, and pain VAS during tonic pressure stimulation. Cutaneous and pressure pain sensitivity were assessed over the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and deltoideus muscles, and at the web space between first and second finger. RESULTS: Increased VAS pain scores and increased pressure pain sensitivity of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles were found in both sides one day after the NGF injection compared with baseline. One day after NGF injections, the time until participants stopped exercising was reduced compared with baseline. The increased muscle pain sensitivity was not normalized by intramuscular ropivacaine. Saline caused increased VAS pain scores compared with ropivacaine. DISCUSSION: Muscle pain and spreading hyperalgesia induced by NGF is maintained despite anesthesia of the primary nociceptive locus. This indicates that intramuscular injection of local anesthetics may not be a valid diagnostic method for primary muscle pain.
机译:目的:为治疗和诊断目的而进行局部麻醉的注射是常见的临床实践。这项双盲安慰剂对照研究探索了局部麻醉阻滞剂的合理性,以检测肌肉疼痛是散发痛觉过敏情况的主要产生者。方法:通过在11名健康志愿者的左,上棘上肌注射神经生长因子(NGF)来诱发实验性肌肉疼痛。一天后,在左或右上棘肌中以随机双盲方式在超声引导下给予罗哌卡因和盐水。 NGF之前,第1天(罗哌卡因/生理盐水之前和之后)和第7天的评估包括:视觉模拟量表(VAS)静止和肩膀耸肩时的疼痛评分,直到由于疼痛导致运动中断的时间,皮肤疼痛敏感性,压力疼痛阈值,并在强直压力刺激期间使VAS疼痛。评估了棘上肌,腕下肌和三角肌以及第一根和第二根手指之间的网状空间的皮肤和压力疼痛敏感性。结果:与基线相比,NGF注射后一天,两侧的VAS疼痛评分均增加,而腕上肌和棘下肌的压力疼痛敏感性增加。与基线相比,NGF注射后一天,参与者停止运动的时间减少了。肌肉内罗哌卡因不能使增加的肌肉疼痛敏感性标准化。与罗哌卡因相比,盐水引起的VAS疼痛评分增加。讨论:尽管麻醉了主要伤害感受位点,但NGF仍可引起肌肉疼痛和痛觉过敏。这表明肌注局部麻醉药可能不是原发性肌肉疼痛的有效诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号