首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Treatment-related and patient-related expectations of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of published measurement tools.
【24h】

Treatment-related and patient-related expectations of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of published measurement tools.

机译:肌肉骨骼疾病患者的治疗相关和患者相关期望:已发布的测量工具的系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Many of the various types of treatments that are used in the rehabilitation of patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) require active involvement of the patient. Patient expectations, for instance with regard to treatment, such as physical therapy, could be important prognostic factors. Behavioral interventions to modify those expectations might improve treatment outcome and prevent chronicity. To facilitate this field of research, valid and reliable measurement instruments to assess patient expectations are needed. The aim of this systematic overview was to identify all the relevant published measurement instruments and to describe their clinimetric properties. METHODS: A systematic search of the relevant databases was performed, and all relevant articles were included. Two independent reviewers included the relevant articles and assessed the clinimetric properties. RESULTS: A total of 24 measurement instruments were eligible for inclusion in the review. For most types of MSD, there was only one instrument available. Construct validity, assessed with factor analysis, was tested in two-thirds of the instruments. Other forms of construct validity (eg, convergent validity and divergent validity) were only tested in 10 of the 24 instruments. Reproducibility was only tested in 5 instruments, but the test methods were seldom satisfactory, hampering the interpretation of these results. DISCUSSION: In summary, many instruments have been developed for the treatment of many types of MSD, but the data regarding the validity or reliability of many of the instruments included in this review are scarce. Therefore, in the first place, we strongly recommend that further research is to be carried out to assess the validity and reliability of these instruments. Secondly, it is necessary to assess the instrument's ability to detect change to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that focus on self-efficacy and outcome expectations.
机译:目的:用于肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)患者康复的多种治疗方法都需要患者的积极参与。患者对治疗(例如物理疗法)的期望可能是重要的预后因素。改变这些期望的行为干预措施可能会改善治疗效果并预防慢性病。为了促进这一研究领域,需要有效且可靠的测量工具来评估患者的期望。本系统概述的目的是确定所有相关的已发布测量仪器并描述其斜度特性。方法:对相关数据库进行系统搜索,并纳入所有相关文章。两名独立审稿人包括相关文章并评估了斜度特性。结果:共有24种测量仪器符合纳入评价的条件。对于大多数类型的MSD,只有一种仪器可用。在三分之二的仪器中测试了通过因素分析评估的构建体有效性。其他形式的结构效度(例如收敛效度和发散效度)仅在24种工具中的10种中进行了测试。仅在5种仪器中对可重复性进行了测试,但测试方法很少令人满意,这妨碍了对这些结果的解释。讨论:总而言之,已经开发出了许多可用于治疗多种类型MSD的仪器,但是该评价中所包括的许多仪器的有效性或可靠性方面的数据很少。因此,我们强烈建议首先进行进一步的研究,以评估这些工具的有效性和可靠性。其次,有必要评估该工具检测变化的能力,以便能够评估侧重于自我效能和结果期望的干预措施的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号