...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Central processing of noxious somatic stimuli in patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared with healthy controls.
【24h】

Central processing of noxious somatic stimuli in patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared with healthy controls.

机译:与健康对照组相比,肠易激综合症患者的有害躯体刺激的中央处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare a central analgesic mechanism known as diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) using somatic test stimuli and somatic conditioning stimuli, (CS) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and healthy controls. METHODS: Participants were 48 premenopausal females (27 with IBS), mean age of 29 years. The phasic heat test stimulus (peak temperature, 50 degrees C) was applied to the left palm. The DNIC effect, which measured reductions in average pain ratings (APR) during counter irritation (submersion of the participant's right hand in painful 12 degrees C circulating water) compared with baseline, was compared between groups. In addition, a second, counterbalanced, CS protocol (right hand submerged in nonpainful 32 degrees C circulating water) was performed. Differences in APR between the 2 counterirritation protocols were compared between groups to control for nonspecific effects known to influence DNIC. Psychologic measures and cardiovascular reactivity were also assessed. RESULTS: IBS patients demonstrated smaller DNIC than controls (P=0.011, repeated measures analysis of variance), and greater state-anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and anger-out expression (P<0.05). Group differences in DNIC were enhanced after controlling for nonspecific effects occurring during the nonpainful CS, and for psychologic measures (P=0.001, repeated measures analysis of covariance). There were no group differences in age, cardiovascular reactivity, APR, or pain ratings for the 12 degrees C CS. DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate deficient DNIC in IBS. This is the first study to adequately control for alternative explanations of pain reduction during counterirritation. Only by controlling for nonspecific effects can evidence of deficient DNIC be attributed to dysregulation in endogenous analgesic mechanisms.
机译:目的:比较在肠易激综合征(IBS)患者和健康对照中使用体细胞测试刺激和体细胞条件刺激(CS)的一种称为弥散性有害抑制控制(DNIC)的中央镇痛机制。方法:参与者为48名绝经前女性(27名患有IBS),平均年龄为29岁。将相热测试刺激(峰值温度,50摄氏度)应用于左手掌。比较两组的DNIC效果,该效果测量了在反刺激(参与者右手浸入12°C疼痛的循环水中)期间的平均疼痛等级(APR)降低。此外,还执行了第二个平衡CS协议(右手浸没在32摄氏度无痛循环水中)。在两组之间比较两种抗刺激方案之间的APR差异,以控制已知会影响DNIC的非特异性作用。还评估了心理措施和心血管反应性。结果:IBS患者表现出的DNIC比对照组小(P = 0.011,重复测量方差分析),并且状态焦虑,抑郁,灾难性和愤怒表达更高(P <0.05)。在控制了非疼痛性CS期间发生的非特异性作用和心理措施之后,DNIC的组间差异得到了加强(P = 0.001,重复测量协方差分析)。对于12摄氏度的CS,年龄,心血管反应性,APR或疼痛等级无分组差异。讨论:这些数据表明IBS中的DNIC不足。这是第一个充分控制反刺激过程中疼痛减轻的替代解释的研究。只有控制非特异性作用,才能将DNIC不足的证据归因于内源性止痛机制的失调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号