...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Gabapentin Supplemented With Ropivacain Block of Trigger Points Improves Pain Control and Quality of Life in Trigeminal Neuralgia Patients When Compared With Gabapentin Alone.
【24h】

Gabapentin Supplemented With Ropivacain Block of Trigger Points Improves Pain Control and Quality of Life in Trigeminal Neuralgia Patients When Compared With Gabapentin Alone.

机译:与单独使用加巴喷丁相比,加巴喷丁补充有罗哌卡因的触发点阻滞剂可改善三叉神经痛患者的疼痛控制和生活质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Pain control in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is achieved using anticonvulsivants, mainly carbamazepine. When this drug cannot be used, other drugs like gabapentin (GBP) have been used to provide adequate pain control. To improve the therapeutic effect of GBP, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of associating GBP with ropivacain (ROP) analgesic block of facial trigger points in TN patients. DESIGN: Thirty-six TN patients were randomly assigned during 4 weeks to 1 of the following protocols: Protocol I-daily oral GBP administered in a titrated dose; Protocol II-ROP applied as analgesic block to TN trigger points once a week; Protocol III-daily oral GBP plus ROP once a week. Protocol II had to be discontinued in 7/12 patients owing to insufficient pain control. Pain intensity was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and disability was assessed by Sickness Impact Profile. RESULTS: When compared with Protocol I, Protocol III (GBP+ROP) patients showed (1) a reduction of VAS score after 7 and 28days of treatment, an effect that was still present 6 and 12 months later; (2) a faster reduction of VAS score using a significantly lower dose of GBP; (3) a smaller total and daily GBP dose at the end of the treatment, which resulted in a total absence of adverse side effects; and (4) an improvement of the functional well-being measured by the Sickness Impact Profile. The number needed to treat (NNT) (GBP+ROP vs. GBP protocols) to obtain 1 GBP+ROP-treated patient with at least 50% pain relief was 1.71 (day 7) and 2.40 (day 28). CONCLUSIONS: The association of GBP and ROP is safe, without side effects and results in an important clinical benefit associated to an improvement of the functional health status of TN patients when compared with GBP alone. This may constitute a therapeutic alternative for pain control in TN patients who cannot be treated with carbamazepine.
机译:目的:使用抗惊厥药(主要是卡马西平)可控制三叉神经痛(TN)的疼痛。当这种药物不能使用时,其他药物如加巴喷丁(GBP)已被用来提供足够的疼痛控制。为了提高GBP的治疗效果,我们评估了TN患者将GBP与罗哌卡因(ROP)止痛镇痛药联用的临床疗效。设计:36名TN患者在4周内被随机分配至以下方案之一:方案I-每日口服滴定剂量的GBP;协议II-ROP每周一次作为镇痛剂应用于TN触发点;协议III-每日口服英镑加ROP,每周一次。由于疼痛控制不力,必须中断7/12患者的治疗方案II。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度,并通过疾病影响曲线评估残疾。结果:与方案I相比,方案III(GBP + ROP)患者显示:(1)治疗7天和28天后VAS评分降低,这种效果在6和12个月后仍然存在; (2)使用明显较低的GBP剂量可以更快地降低VAS评分; (3)治疗结束时的总GBP和每日GBP剂量较小,因此完全没有不良副作用; (4)通过疾病影响概况测得的功能健康状况得到改善。获得1位经GBP + ROP治疗且疼痛缓解至少50%的患者所需的治疗(NNT)(GBP + ROP与GBP方案)的数字分别为1.71(第7天)和2.40(第28天)。结论:与单独使用GBP相比,GBP和ROP的关联是安全的,没有副作用,并且导致与改善TN患者的功能健康状况相关的重要临床益处。这可能构成无法用卡马西平治疗的TN患者疼痛控制的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号