首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Executive summary: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.
【24h】

Executive summary: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.

机译:摘要:继续医学教育的有效性:美国胸科医师学院循证教育指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The importance of CME is reflected in part because it is required by most state licensing boards, which specify an average of 12 to 50 CME hours annually to maintain medical licensure.2 The MOC program of the American Board of Internal Medicine, as an example, intends to (1) improve the quality of patient care, (2) set the standards of clinical competency for internal medicine and its subspecialties, (3) foster continuing scholarship and improvement required for professional excellence over a lifetime of practice, and (4) help to lead quality improvement in medicine, while being respectful of physicians' time.3 A large component of the MOC process is accomplished through CME. With these regulatory obligations, an important question emerges. Is CME simply a system to help physicians fulfill a requirement, or does it effectively improve physician practice leading to better health care?
机译:CME的重要性在一定程度上得到了反映,这是因为大多数州许可委员会都要求使用CME,该委员会每年指定平均12至50个CME小时来维持医疗执照。2例如,美国内科委员会的MOC计划旨在(1)改善患者护理质量,(2)制定内科及其亚专业的临床能力标准,(3)促进持续的奖学金和在实践的一生中提高专业水平所需的进步,和(4)在尊重医师时间的前提下,有助于提高医学质量。3MOC流程的很大一部分是通过CME完成的。伴随着这些监管义务,一个重要的问题出现了。 CME是仅仅是一个可以帮助医生满足要求的系统,还是有效地改善了医生的执业水平从而带来了更好的医疗保健?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号