...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Naturalist: Devoted to the Conceptual Unification of the Biological Sciences >Is sociality driven by the costs of dispersal or the benefits ofphilopatry? A role for kin-discrimination mechanisms
【24h】

Is sociality driven by the costs of dispersal or the benefits ofphilopatry? A role for kin-discrimination mechanisms

机译:社会性是由传播成本或慈善事业的利益驱动的吗?亲属歧视机制的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The role of ecological constraints in promoting sociality is currently much debated. Using a direct-fitness approach, we show this role to depend on the kin-discrimination mechanisms underlying social interactions. Altruism cannot evolve under spatially based discrimination, unless ecological constraints prevent complete dispersal. Increasing constraints enhances both the proportion of philopatric (and thereby altruistic) individuals and the level of altruistic investments conceded in pairwise interactions. Familiarity-based discrimination, by contrast, allows philopatry and altruism to evolve at significant levels even in the absence of ecological constraints. Increasing constraints further enhances the proportion of philopatric (and thereby altruistic) individuals but not the level of altruism conceded. Ecological constraints are thus more likely to affect social evolution in species in which restricted cognitive abilities, large group size, and/or limited period of associative learning force investments to be made on the basis of spatial cues.
机译:当前,生态约束在促进社会发展中的作用尚有争议。使用直接适应方法,我们证明了这一作用取决于社会互动背后的亲属歧视机制。除非生态约束阻止完全分散,否则利他主义就不会在基于空间的歧视之下发展。约束的增加既增加了亲笔交易的人的比例,也增加了利他主义的人的比例,也增加了成对互动中所承认的利他投资的水平。相比之下,即使在没有生态限制的情况下,基于族裔的歧视也使哲学和利他主义得以显着发展。越来越多的约束进一步增加了亲笔交易(因而是无私的)个人的比例,但没有使无私的水平下降。因此,生态约束更有可能影响物种的社会进化,在这些物种中,有限的认知能力,庞大的群体规模和/或有限的联想学习期迫使人们根据空间线索进行投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号