...
首页> 外文期刊>The Agricultural Education Magazine >Oral Reasons for Textbook Judging
【24h】

Oral Reasons for Textbook Judging

机译:教科书评判的口头理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"I started the class with 3, the smoothest, easiest to read in the class. Ideally, I would like to see it longer and more detailed! Even so, I used 3 over 1, as it was a larger size, meatier content with more potential for growth textbook. It was a strong textbook, high reading level that has more student activities, with more depth and natural binding down its side and through all portions of the binding. In addition, it appeared to have a higher page count. However, I do admit that 1 was a more gender-neutral, being more refined about its design, longer chapters, and laid in smoother about its spine, but it was shallower in content, shorter in length with a weak binding."
机译:“我以3课开始学习,这是课堂上最流畅,最容易阅读的课。理想情况下,我希望看到更长,更详细的课!即使如此,我还是使用3而非1,因为它的尺寸更大,内容也更丰富。这是一本强大的教科书,它是一本强大的教科书,具有较高的阅读水平,具有更多的学生活动,具有更深的深度和自然的结合力,贯穿结合的所有部分,而且页数似乎也更多。但是,我确实承认1在性别上更中立,在设计上更精致,章节更长,书脊更平整,但内容较浅,长度较短,绑定较弱。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号