首页> 外文期刊>The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics >A response to Doole and Marsh (2013) article: methodological limitations in the evaluation of policies to reduce nitrate leaching from New Zealand agriculture
【24h】

A response to Doole and Marsh (2013) article: methodological limitations in the evaluation of policies to reduce nitrate leaching from New Zealand agriculture

机译:对Doole和Marsh(2013)文章的回应:评估减少新西兰农业中硝酸盐淋失政策的方法学局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent paper by Doole and Marsh (2013), questioned the validity of using the New Zealand Forest and Agriculture Regional Model (NZFARM) for New Zealand agri-environmental policy analysis. We respond to their critique by clearly describing the model structure, explaining the NZFARM parameterisation, calibration, and validation procedure, and presenting estimates from a series of nutrient reduction policy scenarios to highlight the utility of the model. In doing so, we demonstrate that NZFARM generates logical and intuitive results that can be used for robust agri-environmental policy decision-making.
机译:Doole和Marsh(2013)最近发表的一篇论文质疑了使用新西兰森林和农业区域模型(NZFARM)进行新西兰农业环境政策分析的有效性。我们通过清晰地描述模型结构,解释NZFARM参数化,校准和验证程序以及提出一系列营养减少政策方案的估算值来回应他们的批评,以突出模型的实用性。通过这样做,我们证明了NZFARM产生了逻辑和直观的结果,可用于强大的农业环境政策决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号