...
【24h】

Outcomes of subsyndromal depression in older primary care patients.

机译:老年初级保健患者的综合征下抑郁症的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Most older persons in primary care suffering clinically significant depressive symptoms do not meet criteria for major or minor depression. The authors tested the hypothesis that patients with subsyndromal depression (SSD) would have poorer psychiatric, medical, and functional outcomes at follow-up than nondepressed patients but not as poor as those with minor or major depression. The authors also explored the relative outcomes of three definitions of SSD to determine their relative prognostic value. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Primary care practices in Monroe County, NY. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-one primary care patients aged 65 years and older who completed research assessments at intake and at least 1 year of follow-up evaluation. MEASUREMENTS: Depression diagnoses and three definitions of SSD were determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Other validated measures assessed anxiety, cognition, medical burden, and functional status. RESULTS: Patients with SSD had poorer 1-year lagged outcomes than nondepressed subjects in terms of psychiatric symptoms and functional status, often not significantly different than major or minor depression. Two of the SSD definitions identified subjects with poorer psychiatric and functional outcomes than the third SSD definition. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be vigilant in caring for patients with SSD, monitoring for persistent, or worsening depressive symptoms including suicidality, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and functional decline. Researchers may use particular SSD definitions to identify individuals at higher risk of poor outcomes, to better understand the relationships of SSD to functional disability, and to test innovative preventive and therapeutic interventions.
机译:目的:大多数基层医疗机构中患有临床上显着的抑郁症状的老年人不符合重度或轻度抑郁的标准。作者检验了以下假设:与非抑郁症患者相比,患有亚症候群抑郁症(SSD)的患者在随访时的精神,医学和功能结局较差,但不如轻度或重度抑郁症患者差。作者还探讨了SSD的三种定义的相对结果,以确定它们的相对预后价值。设计:前瞻性观察队列研究。地点:纽约州门罗县的初级保健实践。参与者:481名65岁及65岁以上的初级保健患者在入院时和至少一年的随访评估中完成了研究评估。测量:抑郁症的诊断和对SSD的三个定义由《精神疾病诊断和统计手册结构化临床访谈》(第四版)和24项汉密尔顿抑郁等级量表确定。其他经过验证的措施评估了焦虑,认知,医疗负担和功能状态。结果:就精神症状和功能状态而言,SSD患者的1年滞后性较非抑郁者差,通常与严重或轻度抑郁无明显差异。与第三个SSD定义相比,其中两个SSD定义确定了较弱的精神和功能结果的受试者。结论:临床医生应保持警惕,以照顾SSD患者,监测持续或恶化的抑郁症状,包括自杀,焦虑,认知障碍和功能下降。研究人员可以使用特定的SSD定义来识别处于不良结果风险较高的人群,更好地了解SSD与功能障碍的关系,并测试创新的预防和治疗干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号