...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Assessment of need for repeat ERCP during biliary stent removal after clinical resolution of postcholecystectomy bile leak.
【24h】

Assessment of need for repeat ERCP during biliary stent removal after clinical resolution of postcholecystectomy bile leak.

机译:评估胆囊切除术后胆漏的临床解决方案后,在胆道支架拆除过程中是否需要重复ERCP。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: In patients who have undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile leak there is limited evidence to support the repeat ERCP at the time of stent removal. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biliary stent removal may suffice. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course of patients who underwent biliary stent placement for a postcholecystectomy bile leak and determine whether repeat ERCP is necessary. METHODS: We identified all adult patients who underwent biliary stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile leak from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2008. Demographic data, cholecystectomy details, and procedural data were collected, specifically focusing on closure of the bile leak. Time to resolution of leak was calculated, up to either the date of the first repeat ERCP that demonstrated no persistent leak or the date of removal of any radiologically placed percutaneous drain, whichever came first. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent repeat ERCP with biliary stent removal. The median time to repeat ERCP was 36 days (interquartile range (IQR) 26-48). Fifty-seven (89%) patients had resolved the leak by time of repeat ERCP. Of those in whom the leak had not resolved, 6 had a repeat exam within 14 days of stent placement; 4 of these resolved the leak by day 39. There were no procedure-related complications in the ERCP group. Thirteen patients underwent EGD with stent removal after a median of 29 days (IQR 23-38). None had adverse events, with a median follow-up of 38 months. Overall, the median time to resolution of biliary leak was 33 days (IQR 22-44). Importantly, repeat ERCP altered the management in only one patient in whom bile duct stones were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with uncomplicated postcholecystectomy bile leak who have clinically resolved their leak do not require cholangiography at the time of stent removal. In these patients, EGD with stent removal at 4-6 weeks seems to be sufficient and significantly less expensive.
机译:目的:在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)并置入胆道支架以进行胆囊切除术后胆漏的患者中,仅有有限的证据支持在去除支架时再次进行ERCP。食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)切除胆道支架可能就足够了。本研究的目的是描述因胆囊切除术后胆漏而进行胆道支架置入术的患者的临床过程,并确定是否需要重复ERCP。方法:我们确定了从1996年1月1日至2008年10月31日接受胆道支架置入术的所有成年患者,并进行了胆囊切除术。计算出解决泄漏的时间,直到第一次发现没有持续性泄漏的ERCP重复日期或任何经放射学检查的经皮引流管清除的日期为止,以先到者为准。结果:64例患者再次行ERCP并移除了胆道支架。重复ERCP的中位时间为36天(四分位间距(IQR)26-48)。重复ERCP时,五十七(89%)位患者已解决了渗漏。在没有解决渗漏的患者中,有6例在放置支架后的14天内进行了重复检查;其中有4个在第39天之前解决了泄漏。ERCP组中没有与手术相关的并发症。中位29天后,有13例患者接受了EGD支架切除术(IQR 23-38)。没有人发生不良事件,平均随访38个月。总体而言,解决胆漏的中位时间为33天(IQR 22-44)。重要的是,只有一名发现胆管结石的患者,重复ERCP改变了治疗。结论:没有并发症的胆囊切除术后胆漏患者在临床上已解决了其漏气,在取出支架时无需进行胆道造影。在这些患者中,EGD在4-6周时摘除支架似乎就足够了,而且价格便宜得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号