首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Gastroenterology >Esophageal Stasis on a timed barium esophagogram predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with long-standing achalasia
【24h】

Esophageal Stasis on a timed barium esophagogram predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with long-standing achalasia

机译:定时食管造影检查的食管淤积可预测长期long门症患者的复发症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: In achalasia, early recognition of the need for retreatment is of crucial importance to reduce morbidity and long-term complications such as esophageal decompensation. In clinical practice, symptoms and parameters of esophageal function including lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and esophageal emptying are used to decide whether additional treatment is required. However, which of these tests performs best remains unclear. Methods: A cohort of 41 patients with long-standing achalasia (median 17 years), underwent esophageal manometry, timed barium esophagogram and symptom evaluation. Patients were followed up for 10 years, and were regarded as a therapeutic failure if Eckardt score was >3 or when retreatment was needed. Predictors of therapeutic failure were evaluated. Results: Of the 41 included patients, 7 patients had an elevated LES pressure (>10 mm Hg) and 26 had esophageal stasis >5 cm on timed barium esophagogram. During follow-up, 25 patients had recurrence of symptoms and were considered therapeutic failures. Of the 25 patients, 5 had an elevated LES pressure, whereas 22 had esophageal stasis on barium esophagogram. Hence, the sensitivity to predict the need of retreatment is higher for esophageal stasis (88%) compared with LES pressure (20%). A total of 16 patients (39%) were in long-term remission, of which 12 patients (75%) did not have stasis at their initial visit. Conclusions: In contrast to LES pressure, esophageal stasis is a good predictor of treatment failure in patients with long-standing achalasia. Based on these findings, we propose to use timed barium esophagogram rather than esophageal manometry as test to decide on retreatment.
机译:目的:在门失弛缓症中,尽早认识到需要再治疗对于减少发病率和长期并发症(例如食管代偿失调)至关重要。在临床实践中,食管功能的症状和参数(包括较低的食管括约肌(LES)压力和食管排空)用于确定是否需要其他治疗。但是,尚不清楚哪个测试执行得最好。方法:队列41例长期门失弛缓症(中位17岁),接受食管测压,定时钡剂食道造影和症状评估。对患者进行了10年的随访,如果Eckardt评分> 3或需要重新治疗,则被视为治疗失败。评价治疗失败的预测因素。结果:在41例患者中,定时钡餐食管造影检查显示7例LES压力升高(> 10 mm Hg),26例食管淤积> 5 cm。在随访期间,有25例患者症状复发,被视为治疗失败。在25例患者中,有5例LES压力升高,而22例在钡餐食管造影上出现食管淤滞。因此,与LES压力(20%)相比,预测食道淤积需要再治疗的敏感性更高(88%)。共有16例患者(39%)处于长期缓解状态,其中12例患者(75%)在初次就诊时没有淤滞。结论:与LES压力相比,食管淤积是长期门症患者治疗失败的良好预测指标。基于这些发现,我们建议使用定时钡剂食管造影术而不是食管测压法作为决定再治疗的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号