...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Disparities in trauma care: Are fewer diagnostic tests conducted for uninsured patients with pelvic fracture?
【24h】

Disparities in trauma care: Are fewer diagnostic tests conducted for uninsured patients with pelvic fracture?

机译:创伤护理方面的差异:对没有保险的骨盆骨折患者进行的诊断检查是否较少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Research from other medical specialties suggests that uninsured patients experience treatment delays, receive fewer diagnostic tests, and have reduced health literacy when compared with their insured counterparts. We hypothesized that these disparities in interventions would not be present among patients experiencing trauma. Our objective was to examine differences in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures administered to patients undergoing trauma with pelvic fractures using a national database. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), 2002 to 2006. Patients aged 18 to 64 years who experienced blunt injuries with pelvic fractures were analyzed. Patients who were dead on arrival, those with an injury severity score (ISS) less than 9, those with traumatic brain injury, and patients with burns were excluded. The likelihood of the uninsured receiving select diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was compared with the same likelihood in the insured. Multivariate analysis for mortality was conducted, adjusting for age, sex, race, ISS, presence of shock, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score, and mechanism of injury. Results: Twenty-one thousand patients met the inclusion criteria: 82% of these patients were insured and 18% were uninsured. There was no clinical difference in ISSs (21 vs 20), but the uninsured were more likely to present in shock (P <.001). The mortality rate in the uninsured was 11.6% vs 5.0% in the insured (P <.001). The uninsured were less likely to receive vascular ultrasonography (P =.01) and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen (P <.005). There was no difference in the rates of CT of the thorax and abdominal ultrasonography, but the uninsured were more likely to receive radiographs. There was no difference in exploratory laparotomy and fracture reduction, but uninsured patients were less likely to receive transfusions, central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring, or arterial catheterization for embolization. Insurance-based disparities were less evident in level 1 trauma centers. Conclusions: Uninsured patients with pelvic fractures get fewer diagnostic procedures compared with their insured counterparts; this disparity is much greater for more invasive and resource-intensive tests and is less apparent in level 1 trauma centers. Differences in care that patients receive after trauma may be 1 of the mechanisms that leads to insurance disparities in outcomes after trauma.
机译:背景:来自其他医学专业的研究表明,与参保同行相比,未参保患者经历了治疗延误,接受更少的诊断检查并降低了健康素养。我们假设在遭受创伤的患者中不会出现这些干预差异。我们的目标是使用国家数据库来检查对患有骨盆骨折创伤的患者进行的诊断和治疗程序的差异。方法:使用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)于2002年至2006年进行回顾性分析。分析了18至64岁的骨盆骨折钝伤的患者。到达时死亡的患者,损伤严重度评分(ISS)小于9的患者,脑外伤的患者以及烧伤患者被排除在外。将未保险人接受选择的诊断和治疗程序的可能性与被保险人相同的可能性进行了比较。进行了死亡率的多变量分析,调整了年龄,性别,种族,ISS,休克的存在,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)运动评分和损伤机制。结果:21 000名患者符合入选标准:这些患者中82%被保险,18%未保险。 ISS的临床差异无统计学意义(21比20),但未投保者更容易出现休克(P <.001)。未保险者的死亡率为11.6%,而被保险者为5.0%(P <.001)。未投保的人接受血管超声检查(P = .01)和腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的可能性较小(P <.005)。胸部和腹部超声的CT率无差异,但未保险者更有可能接受X光片检查。探索性剖腹手术和骨折复位没有差异,但是未投保的患者接受输血,中心静脉压(CVP)监测或动脉导管栓塞的可能性较小。在一级创伤中心,基于保险的差异并不明显。结论:与参保同行相比,未参保的骨盆骨折患者获得的诊断程序更少。对于更具侵入性和资源密集型的测试,这种差异更大,而在1级创伤中心则不那么明显。创伤后患者接受的护理差异可能是导致创伤后结局保险差异的机制之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号