首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on functional outcomes in anemic, critically ill, trauma subjects: The Long Term Trauma Outcomes Study
【24h】

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on functional outcomes in anemic, critically ill, trauma subjects: The Long Term Trauma Outcomes Study

机译:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究,评估重组人促红细胞生成素对贫血,重症,创伤性受试者的功能结局的影响:长期创伤结果研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Achieving a higher hemoglobin (Hb) level might allow the anemic, critically ill, trauma patient to have an improved outcome during rehabilitation therapy. Methods: Patients with major blunt trauma orthopedic injuries were administered epoetin alfa or placebo weekly both in hospital and for up to 12 weeks after discharge or until the Hb level was >12.0 g/dL, whichever occurred first. The 36-question Short Form Health Assessment questionnaire (SF-36) was used to evaluate physical function (PF) outcomes at baseline, at hospital discharge, and at several time points posthospital discharge. Results: One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled (epoetin alfa [n = 97], placebo [n = 95]). Hb increased from baseline to hospital discharge in both groups (epoetin alfa: 1.2 g/dL vs placebo: 0.9 g/dL), and transfusion requirements were similar between groups. Both groups showed improvements in SF-36 PF; there were no significant differences in the average of all posthospital discharge scores (epoetin alfa: 27.3 vs placebo 30.9; P = 0.38). Thromboembolic events were similar between groups. Conclusions: No differences were observed in physical function outcomes or safety in anemic, critically ill, trauma patients treated with epoetin alfa compared with placebo.
机译:背景:获得更高的血红蛋白(Hb)水平可能使贫血,重症,外伤患者在康复治疗期间具有更好的预后。方法:在医院以及出院后至多12周内,每周一次对重度钝性创伤整形外科骨伤患者进行依泊汀阿尔法或安慰剂治疗,直至血红蛋白水平> 12.0 g / dL,以先发生者为准。使用36个问题的简易健康评估问卷(SF-36)评估基线,出院时以及医院出院后几个时间点的身体机能(PF)结果。结果:纳入192例患者(阿尔法依泊汀[n = 97],安慰剂[n = 95])。两组从基线到出院的血红蛋白均升高(阿波替丁α:1.2 g / dL,安慰剂:0.9 g / dL),两组之间的输血需求相似。两组均显示出SF-36 PF的改善;所有院后出院分数的平均值均无显着差异(依波汀α:27.3 vs安慰剂30.9; P = 0.38)。两组之间的血栓栓塞事件相似。结论:与安慰剂相比,用依泊汀α治疗的贫血,重症,创伤患者的身体功能结局或安全性没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号