首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Comment on: Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm in diameter
【24h】

Comment on: Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm in diameter

机译:评论:开放性腹膜内与肌注后肌网修补术治疗直径小于3 cm的脐疝

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the January issue of The American Journal of Surgery, Berrevoet et al report on 116 patients who had umbilical hernia repair. They compare a retromuscular repair using Vypro mesh (Ethicon, Livingston, Scotland) with an intra-peritoneal repair using the Ventralex mesh (Bard, Helsing-borg, Sweden). The Vypro repair took over twice as long, and the hospital stay was longer than the Ventralex group. There were more seromas in the retromuscular Vypro group. Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the intraperitoneal Ventralex group. There were 5 recurrences in the Ventralex group and 2 in the Vypro group, which was not statistically significant.
机译:在1月号的《美国外科杂志》上,Berrevoet等人报告了116位接受了脐疝修补术的患者。他们比较了使用Vypro网格(Ethicon,利文斯顿,苏格兰)进行的后肌修复与使用Ventralex网格(Bard,Helsing-borg,瑞典)进行的腹膜内修复。 Vypro的维修时间翻倍,而且住院时间比Ventralex组更长。后肌Vypro组中有更多的血清肿。腹膜内Ventralex组的术后疼痛明显降低。 Ventralex组有5例复发,Vypro组有2例复发,但无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号