...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of orthopedics >The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty.
【24h】

The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty.

机译:在全髋关节置换术中使用较大的股骨头的利弊。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the introduction of improved bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has come a reintroduction of larger femoral heads with the promise of reducing the rate of hip instability and increasing hip range of motion (ROM). The size of femoral heads used for THA ranges from 22 to 40 mm, and even larger heads are used for hip resurfacing. With accurately positioned components, larger heads reduce the hip instability rate and theoretically increase hip ROM. However, for any given bearing surface, the volumetric wear rate is higher for larger heads than for smaller heads, which potentially jeopardizes the long-term survival of these reconstructions. In this article, we review the evidence for use of larger femoral heads with respect to stability, ROM, impingement, wear rate, bearing surfaces, and future directions.
机译:随着改进的全髋关节置换术(THA)支承面的引入,大股骨头被重新引入,有望减少髋关节不稳的发生率并增加髋关节活动范围(ROM)。用于THA的股骨头尺寸范围为22至40 mm,甚至更大的头部用于髋关节表面置换。借助准确定位的组件,较大的头部可降低髋关节不稳率,并在理论上增加髋关节ROM。但是,对于任何给定的轴承表面,大头的体积磨损率要比小头的高,这可能危及这些重建的长期生存。在本文中,我们将就稳定性,ROM,撞击,磨损率,支承面和未来方向等方面,回顾使用较大的股骨头的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号