首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Insisting on the Healer's Art: The Implications of Required Participation in a Medical School Course on Values and Humanism
【24h】

Insisting on the Healer's Art: The Implications of Required Participation in a Medical School Course on Values and Humanism

机译:坚持治疗者的艺术:价值观念与人本主义医学院课程必修课的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Theory: Elective courses, by definition, allow medical students to self-select for participation in the class. In a small-group learning setting, students uninterested or not ready for a particular learning topic might change the educational experience (poison the well) for those students most interested in the topic. It is not known how medical students required to take a course in humanism (that they otherwise would not have elected to take) might be impacted by the course or how their presence might affect students originally interested in the course. Hypotheses: Medical students in a required course on humanism and values in medicine will have different experiences based on whether a particular student might have or not have elected to enroll in the course. Students uninterested in taking a course in humanism and values, but required to enroll, will limit the benefit of the course for those students originally interested in participating. Method: In 2012, all 1st-year students at a U.S. medical school were required to take the Healer's Art, an elective on professional values and humanism offered at more than 90 other schools in the United States and internationally. Students completed pre/postcourse surveys assessing emotional exhaustion, work engagement, positive emotions, and cynicism. We analyzed differences between those who would have elected to take the course (Elective students) and those who would not have elected to take it (Required students). Results: Elective students did not differ from Required students in baseline demographic characteristics, emotional exhaustion, work engagement, or positive emotions. At baseline, Elective students did report feeling safer to talk openly, a greater sense of community, and higher levels of cynicism. Over time, there were no differences in course evaluations or outcomes between Elective and Required students. Conclusions: Required students do not differ greatly from those who would have elected to take Healer's Art, and all students appear to have similar experiences in the course.
机译:理论:根据定义,选修课程允许医学生自行选择参加课程。在小组学习的环境中,对某个特定学习主题不感兴趣或没有做好准备的学生可能会改变对该主题最感兴趣的学生的教育经验(毒化)。尚不知道医学生被要求参加人文学科课程的方式(否则他们将不会被选修)可能会受到该课程的影响,或者他们的存在会如何影响最初对课程感兴趣的学生。假设:在一门必修课程中,关于人文主义和医学价值观的医学生会根据特定学生是否选择参加该课程而有不同的经历。对人文和价值观课程不感兴趣的学生,但被要求报名,这将限制该课程对最初对参与感兴趣的学生的利益。方法:2012年,美国医学院的所有一年级学生都必须参加Healer's Art,这是美国和国际上其他90余所学校提供的专业价值观和人文主义选修课。学生完成了课前/课后调查,评估了情绪衰竭,工作投入,积极情绪和犬儒主义。我们分析了选择参加该课程的学生(选修学生)与不选择参加该课程的学生(必修学生)之间的差异。结果:选修课程的学生在基本人口统计学特征,情绪疲惫,工作投入或积极情绪方面与要求的学生没有差异。在基线时,选修课程的学生确实报告说公开交谈感到更安全,社区意识增强,犬儒主义程度更高。随着时间的流逝,选修课和必修课的学生在课程评估或结果方面没有差异。结论:所需的学生与那些选择参加《治愈者的艺术》的人相差无几,并且所有学生在课程中似乎都有相似的经历。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号