首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Utilization of Exploration-Based Learning and Video-Assisted Learning to Teach GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy
【24h】

Utilization of Exploration-Based Learning and Video-Assisted Learning to Teach GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy

机译:利用基于探索的学习和视频辅助学习来教学GlideScope电子喉镜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: GlideScope (GS) is used in pediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI) but requires a different technique compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Purposes: This article was written to evaluate the efficacy of exploration-based learning on procedural performance using GS for ETI of simulated pediatric airways and establish baseline success rates and procedural duration using DL in airway trainers among pediatric providers at various levels. Methods: Fifty-five pediatric residents, fellows, and faculty from Pediatric Critical Care, NICU, and Pediatric Emergency Medicine were enrolled. Nine physicians from Pediatric Anesthesia benchmarked expert performance. Participants completed a demographic survey and viewed a video by the GS manufacturer. Subjects spent 15 minutes exploring GS equipment and practicing the intubation procedure. Participants then intubated neonatal, infant, child, and adult airway simulators, using GS and DL, in random order. Time to ETI was recorded. Results: Procedural performance after exploration-based learning, measured as time to successful ETI, was shorter for DL than for GS for neonatal and child airways at the.05 significance level. Time to ETI in adult airway using DL was correlated with experience level (p =.01). Failure rates were not different among subgroups. Conclusions: A brief video and period of exploration-based learning is insufficient for implementing a new technology. Pediatricians at various levels of training intubated simulated airways faster using DL than GS.
机译:背景:GlideScope(GS)用于小儿气管插管(ETI),但与直接喉镜检查(DL)相比需要不同的技术。目的:本文旨在评估基于探索的学习方法对使用GS的模拟儿科气道的ETI的程序性能的效果,并使用DL在不同级别的儿科医师中确定气道培训师的基线成功率和程序持续时间。方法:招募了55名来自儿科重症监护室,新生儿重症监护病房和儿科急诊医学的儿科住院医师,研究员和教职工。来自小儿麻醉的9位医师对专家的表现进行了基准测试。参加者完成了一项人口统计调查,并观看了GS制造商的视频。受试者花了15分钟探索GS设备并练习插管程序。然后,参与者以随机顺序使用GS和DL插管新生儿,婴儿,儿童和成人气道模拟器。记录到ETI的时间。结果:以探索性学习后的程序性能(以成功取得ETI的时间来衡量),对于新生儿和儿童气道,在DL方面,DL较GS短,在0.05显着性水平上。使用DL的成人气道ETI时间与经验水平相关(p = .01)。失败率在各亚组之间没有差异。结论:一段简短的视频和一段基于探索的学习时间不足以实施新技术。与GS相比,使用DL进行各种训练的儿科医生使用DL插管模拟气道的速度更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号