首页> 外文期刊>Technovation: The International Journal of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Management >What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university-industry interaction
【24h】

What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university-industry interaction

机译:哪种类型的教职员工与哪种类型的公司互动?大学与产业互动非本地化的一些原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While there is significant interest in improving university-industry interaction, literature on the university side has tended not to focus on the characteristics of the personnel involved and has largely ignored the issue that there are differences between types of faculty member in their degrees of interaction. This question is especially relevant at regional level, as those faculty members who do interact with industry may show a preference for firms that are larger and technologically superior to those in the region. Most analysts, however, have tended to focus on the national level, particularly on those countries at the forefront of technological innovation. In the absence of any formal theory, we propose a two-step method to formulate the hypothesis that only selected faculty members interact with selected firms. First, we identify the type of faculty member who interacts with firms. Second, we examine whether this type of faculty member interacts with every type of firm. A test sample is drawn from the Valencian Community of Spain, a region with low absorptive capacity, where firms may show undesirable properties for university interaction. The results allow us to challenge the view that certain individual universities may show a higher propensity for interaction once we take into account differences between the individual characteristics of their faculty members. We also claim that in a region like the Valencian Community, faculty members who usually participate in contracts (male, holding an administrative position) do so mainly with larger firms, but not with firms from their own region, where they find lower technological standards. This partly explains the delocalisation of university-industry interaction.
机译:尽管人们对改善大学与产业之间的互动有着极大的兴趣,但是大学方面的文献倾向于不关注所涉人员的特征,并且在很大程度上忽略了教职人员类型之间的相互作用程度存在差异的问题。这个问题在地区层面上尤其重要,因为那些与行业互动的教师可能会偏爱那些规模更大,技术上优于该地区的公司。但是,大多数分析家倾向于将重点放在国家层面,特别是在那些处于技术创新前沿的国家。在没有任何形式理论的情况下,我们提出了一种分两步的方法来阐述只有选定的教职员工与选定的公司互动的假设。首先,我们确定与公司互动的教师类型。其次,我们检查这种类型的教师是否与每种类型的公司进行交互。测试样本来自吸收能力低的西班牙巴伦西亚自治区,在该地区企业可能表现出不良的大学互动特性。这一结果使我们对以下观点提出了质疑:一旦我们考虑到各大学教职员工个人特征之间的差异,某些大学可能会表现出更高的互动倾向。我们还声称,在巴伦西亚自治区这样的地区,通常参加合同的教师(男性,担任行政职务)主要是与较大的公司合作,而不是与自己所在地区的公司合作,因为他们所在的地区技术标准较低。这部分解释了大学与产业互动的非本地化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号