...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Soil Science >A comparison of effects of one-pass and conventional potato hilling on water runoff and soil erosion under simulated rainfall
【24h】

A comparison of effects of one-pass and conventional potato hilling on water runoff and soil erosion under simulated rainfall

机译:模拟降雨下单程和常规马铃薯耕作对径流和土壤侵蚀的影响比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Xing, Z., Chow, L., Rees, H. W., Meng, F., Monteith, J. and Stevens, L. 2011. A comparison of effects of one-pass and conventional potato hilling on water runoff and soil erosion under simulated rainfall. Can. J. Soil Sci. 91: 279-290. Hilling plays an important role in potato production, but is found to be inducing soil loss. An artificial rainfall simulation system was used to evaluate the differences between one-pass hilling (OPH, hilling performed when planting, or shortly after planting) and conventional hilling (CH, hilling performed approximately 35-45 d after planting) as well as their combination with a cover crop (ryegrass; _R) on runoff and soil loss. A three-replicate randomized block experimental design with constant rainfall intensity (120 mm h I) was used in this study. No significant differences in runoff were found between different billing methods. The soil losses, however, showed significant differences both among treatments, among canopy cover classes, and among their interaction terms (all P<0.001). The mean soil loss for CH was significantly higher than that for OPH, by 40%, and the mean soil loss for CH_R was higher than that for OPH_R by 57%. On average, the CH treatments (CH and CH_R) induced greater soil loss than the OPH treatments (OPH and OPH_R) by 47%. Further, the effects can vary with different canopy cover percentages. The OPH treatments (OPH and OPH_R) induced more soil loss than CH treatments (CH and CH_R), by 4.4 to 12.8%, in the <30% canopy cover group, while soil loss in the CH treatments was greater than that in OPH treatments for both the 30-70% and >70% canopy cover groups by 21-94%. Irrespective of treatment, soil loss before canopy forming was 2.4 to 8.9 times higher than the soil loss for the partial to full canopy period. With a cover crop, the CH and OPH treatments can reduce soil loss by 37-55%. One-pass hilling initiated runoff earlier than CH. The water runoff and soil loss with respect to the elapsed time since initialization of water runoff and soil loss could be modeled by a three-parameter Sigmoid function with r(2) >= 0.94. The information generated from this study could be used in landscape modeling to study the impacts of potato production on soil and stream water quality.
机译:Xing,Z.,Chow,L.,Rees,HW,Meng,F.,Monteith,J.和Stevens,L.2011。模拟下单程和常规马铃薯耕作对径流和土壤侵蚀的影响比较雨量。能够。 J.土壤科学。 91:279-290。丘陵在马铃薯生产中起着重要作用,但发现会导致土壤流失。人工降雨模拟系统用于评估单程耕作(OPH,在种植时或种植后不久进行的耕作)与常规耕作(CH,在种植后约35-45 d进行的耕作)之间的差异,覆盖作物(黑麦草; _R)的径流和土壤流失。在这项研究中使用了三个重复的,具有恒定降雨强度(120 mm h I)的随机实验设计。在不同的计费方法之间,没有发现径流的显着差异。然而,水土流失在处理之间,冠层覆盖类别之间以及交互作用项之间均显示出显着差异(所有P <0.001)。 CH的平均土壤流失率比OPH的平均土壤流失率高40%,CH_R的平均土壤流失率比OPH_R的平均土壤流失率高57%。平均而言,CH处理(CH和CH_R)比OPH处理(OPH和OPH_R)引起更大的土壤流失47%。此外,效果会随不同的树冠覆盖百分比而变化。在<30%的覆盖率下,OPH处理(OPH和OPH_R)引起的土壤流失比CH处理(CH和CH_R)引起的流失更多,达4.4%至12.8%,而CH处理的土壤流失大于OPH处理的土壤流失对于30-70%和> 70%的树冠覆盖组,降低了21-94%。无论采用何种处理方式,冠层形成前的土壤流失比部分或整个冠层期内的土壤流失高2.4到8.9倍。对于覆盖作物,CH和OPH处理可以减少37-55%的土壤流失。一通山坡比CH更早地启动了径流。自初始化水径流和水土流失以来经过的时间的水径流和水土流失可以通过三参数Sigmoid函数建模,其中r(2)> = 0.94。这项研究产生的信息可以用于景观建模,以研究马铃薯生产对土壤和溪流水质的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号