...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Reliable harvesting of a large thoracodorsal artery perforator flap with emphasis on perforator number and spacing.
【24h】

Reliable harvesting of a large thoracodorsal artery perforator flap with emphasis on perforator number and spacing.

机译:可靠地收获胸大动脉穿支皮瓣,重点是穿支皮的数量和间距。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps are useful for covering extensive defects because of their generous donor-site dimensions. However, large flaps increase the risk of partial flap necrosis, and a reliable means of sizing thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps has not been devised. The authors reviewed a series of large thoracodorsal artery perforator flap transfers performed under various reconstructive conditions to evaluate surgical outcomes and placed emphasis on flap design and harvesting technique. METHODS: A consecutive series of large thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps (>20 cm long) performed between November of 2005 and March of 2010 were included in this study. Patient charts, operative records, and photographs were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 20 flaps with an average size of 25 x 11 cm in 20 patients were identified; the largest flap measured 32 x 13 cm. The average number of perforators included was 2.6 per flap (range, one to four). Four different harvesting techniques were used, depending on perforator numbers and locations. All large flaps survived without sizable partial flap necrosis. Complications included wound dehiscence in one donor and two recipient sites; all healed after wound repair. Tip necrosis of a small area developed but healed with conservative wound care. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the clinical safety of large thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps with customized thickness control, which can be reliably harvested beyond 20 cm in length by carefully considering perforator numbers and locations. To optimize tissue perfusion in these large flaps, effort is required to capture multiple perforators from various sources and to obtain an ideal arrangement. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
机译:背景:胸大动脉穿支皮瓣由于其慷慨的供体部位尺寸,可用于覆盖广泛的缺陷。然而,大的皮瓣增加了部分皮瓣坏死的风险,尚未设计出确定胸大动脉穿支皮瓣大小的可靠方法。作者回顾了在各种重建条件下进行的一系列大型胸大动脉穿支皮瓣转移,以评估手术效果,并着重于皮瓣设计和收获技术。方法:本研究包括2005年11月至2010年3月期间连续进行的一系列大型胸甲动脉穿孔皮瓣(> 20 cm长)。回顾患者病历,手术记录和照片。结果:共鉴定出20例皮瓣,平均大小为25 x 11 cm。最大的皮瓣长32 x 13厘米。每片皮瓣所含的平均穿孔器数量为2.6(范围为1至4)。根据穿孔器的数量和位置,使用了四种不同的收获技术。所有大的皮瓣均存活,而没有部分皮瓣坏死。并发症包括一名供血者和两个受者部位的伤口裂开。伤口修复后全部愈合。小面积坏死发展,但通过保守的伤口护理得到治愈。结论:本研究报告了采用定制厚度控制的大型胸腹动脉穿支皮瓣的临床安全性,通过仔细考虑穿支穿甲器的数量和位置,可以可靠地收获长度超过20 cm的皮瓣。为了优化这些大瓣中的组织灌注,需要努力从各种来源捕获多个穿孔器并获得理想的布置。临床问题/证据水平:治疗,IV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号