【24h】

Cost/Utility study of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in chile.

机译:智利腹膜透析和血液透析的成本/效用研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Chile the reimbursement/patient/year for chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) is USDollars 14,654 and for chronic hemodialysis (HD) USDollars 10,909. However, no study comparing global (direct plus indirect) costs has been performed in our country. Our research objective was to compare global costs and quality of life between the two therapies. Patients (n = 159) from five selected dialysis units in Chile [57 patients on PD (50 on automated PD) and 102 on standard HD (3 x 4 hours weekly)] were retrospectively studied. No patient had previously received the alternate therapy. Items analyzed were quality of life, customer satisfaction, direct and indirect costs, annual global costs, and cost/utility index. Mean age on HD was 54.14 +/- 16.01 years and on PD 49.76 +/- 18.88 years (p > 0.05). No differences in the distribution of diabetic patients between the therapies were found. Hemodialysis and PD groups did not have differences in the quality of life index, although there was better customer satisfactionwith PD than with HD. Direct and indirect costs were calculated. We found significant differences in favor of PD in erythropoietin consumption (2.24 +/- 1.57 vials/week on HD and 1.35 +/- 0.85 vials/week on PD, p < 0.05) and working time (31.0 +/- 13.3 hours/week on HD and 38.5 +/- 12.2 hours/week on PD, p < 0.05). The quality life index (Health-Related SF-36 Health Survey) was 65.75 on HD and 66.88 on PD. Annual global costs were USDollars 20,803 for HD and USDollars 20,742 for PD. The cost/utility index was 3.16 for HD and 3.10 for PD. Patients on PD have an advantage related to erythropoietin consumption and working capacity compared with HD patients. Addition of related indirect costs to reimbursements gives a more accurate insight into treatment costs. Considering all these parameters, we did not find significant differences between HD and PD in quality life index, cost/utility index, or annual global cost in this Chilean end-stage renal disease population.
机译:在智利,慢性腹膜透析(PD)的报销/患者/年为USDollars 14,654,而慢性血液透析(HD)的报销/患者/ USDollars为10,909。但是,我国尚未进行比较全球(直接和间接)成本的研究。我们的研究目标是比较两种疗法之间的全球成本和生活质量。回顾性研究了智利五个选定透析单位的患者(n = 159)[PD患者57例(自动PD 50例)和HD透析102例(每周3 x 4小时)。之前没有患者接受过替代疗法。分析的项目包括生活质量,客户满意度,直接和间接成本,年度全球成本以及成本/效用指数。 HD的平均年龄为54.14 +/- 16.01岁,PD的平均年龄为49.76 +/- 18.88岁(p> 0.05)。两种疗法之间的糖尿病患者分布无差异。血液透析和PD组的生活质量指数没有差异,尽管PD对患者的满意度比对HD高。计算了直接和间接成本。我们发现促红细胞生成素消耗量(在HD上为2.24 +/- 1.57小瓶/周,在PD上为1.35 +/- 0.85小瓶/周,p> 0.05)和工作时间(31.0 +/- 13.3小时/周)之间存在显着的PD差异。 HD时,PD时38.5 +/- 12.2小时/周,p <0.05)。优质生活质量指数(与健康相关的SF-36健康调查)在HD上为65.75,在PD上为66.88。 HD的年度全球总成本为USDollars 20,803,PD的全球年度成本为USDollars 20,742。 HD的成本/效用指数为3.16,PD的为3.10。与HD患者相比,PD患者在促红细胞生成素消耗和工作能力方面具有优势。在报销中加上相关的间接费用可以更准确地了解治疗费用。考虑到所有这些参数,我们在该智利终末期肾病人群中,在质量寿命指数,成本/效用指数或年度全球成本方面,HD和PD之间没有发现显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号