首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: drainage flow and retention strength.
【24h】

Percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: drainage flow and retention strength.

机译:经皮肾造口术导管:引流和保留强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of percutaneous nephrostomy catheter configuration on drainage flow and retention strength. METHODS: The Cook nephrostomy 16F (symmetric balloon), Bardex Council 16F (eccentric balloon), Microvasive Flexima 14F (pigtail), and Bardex Malecot 16F (flange) nephrostomy catheters were attached to an artificial renal pelvis (12-in.-round latex balloon). The balloon was subsequently filled with either 60 mL of water or orange juice with pulp, and gravity drainage of this fluid was recorded as flow into a flowmeter. Using a Force Five Model FDV-100 force gauge, the retention strength was tested by measuring the force required to pull the nephrostomy catheter through an 8-mm hole in a 35-mm-thick biologic tissue specimen (bologna). RESULTS: The maximal flow rate using both orange juice and saline was significantly greater for the Cook nephrostomy than for the Microvasive Flexima, Bardex Malecot, and Bardex Council catheters (P < or = 0.016). The average flow rate using saline for the Cook nephrostomy catheter was significantly greater than for all other catheters (P < or = 0.02) and was significantly greater than for the Microvasive Flexima and the Bardex Council catheters (P < or = 0.036) using orange juice. The retention strength was strongest for the Cook nephrostomy catheter (3.41 +/- 0.14 lb) compared with the Bardex Council (1.75 +/- 0.1), Microvasive Flexima (1.35 +/- 0.3), and Bardex Malecot (0.29 +/- 0.03) catheters. In addition, the Microvasive Flexima catheter resulted in greater maceration of the biologic tissue after forceful dislodgement. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have demonstrated that the Cook nephrostomy catheter combines strong drainage flow and strong retention strength during in vitro testing. Clinical evaluations of the ease of use and patient comfort are warranted.
机译:目的:评估经皮肾造口术导管配置对引流和保留强度的影响。方法:将Cook肾造口术16F(对称球囊),Bardex Council 16F(偏心球囊),Microvasive Flexima 14F(尾纤)和Bardex Malecot 16F(法兰)肾造瘘术导管连接至人造肾盂(12英寸圆形乳胶)气球)。随后在气球中填充60 mL水或带果肉的橙汁,并将这种流体的重力排放记录为流入流量计的流量。使用力五型FDV-100压力计,通过测量将肾造瘘术导管穿过35毫米厚的生物组织样本(博洛尼亚)中的8毫米孔所需的力,来测试保持力。结果:库克肾造口术使用橙汁和盐水的最大流速明显大于微血管挠曲胶,Bardex Malecot和Bardex Council导管(P <或= 0.016)。 Cook肾造口术导管使用生理盐水的平均流速显着大于所有其他导管(P <或= 0.02),并且显着大于使用橙汁的Microvasive Flexima和Bardex Council导管(P <或= 0.036) 。与Bardex委员会(1.75 +/- 0.1),Microvasive Flexima(1.35 +/- 0.3)和Bardex Malecot(0.29 +/- 0.03)相比,Cook肾造口术导管(3.41 +/- 0.14 lb)的保留强度最强。 )导管。另外,在强行移开后,Microvasive Flexima导管导致生物组织的更大浸软。结论:这项研究的结果表明,库克肾造口术导管在体外测试过程中具有强大的引流能力和强大的保留强度。必须对易用性和患者舒适度进行临床评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号