...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian journal of surgery >Safety of tubeless or totally tubeless drainage and nephrostomy tube as a drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comprehensive review
【24h】

Safety of tubeless or totally tubeless drainage and nephrostomy tube as a drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comprehensive review

机译:经皮肾镜取石术后无管或完全无管引流和肾造口术作为引流的安全性:综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Summary Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using a nephrostomy tube as a drainage has been considered the standard procedure. However, recently many literatures have reported the use of tubeless and totally tubeless drainage following PCNL with excellent results. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE databases to review each drainage technique following PCNL (tubeless, totally tubeless, or nephrostomy tube) and also to assess the most recent evidence that compare the safety of these drainage procedures with a clear-cut clinical parameter imposed. Tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL is significantly superior to standard PCNL in terms of length of hospital stay, postoperative pain (visual analog scale) score, demands or dosage of analgesics required, as well as faster return to activity for the patients. However, despite the many advantages of tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL over standard PCNL, there are a number of situations requiring the consideration of nephrostomy tube placement. Nonetheless, decision to use or not to use nephrostomy tube after PCNL depends on the surgeon’s experience and clinical judgment.
机译:小结使用肾造瘘管引流的经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)被认为是标准程序。但是,最近有许多文献报道了PCNL术后使用无管和完全无管引流的效果极佳。使用MEDLINE数据库进行文献检索,以回顾PCNL(无管,完全无管或肾造口术)后的每种引流技术,并评估将这些引流程序的安全性与明确的临床参数进行比较的最新证据。无管或完全无管PCNL在住院时间,术后疼痛(视觉模拟评分)评分,所需镇痛药的剂量或所需剂量以及患者恢复活力方面均明显优于标准PCNL。然而,尽管无管或完全无管PCNL相对于标准PCNL具有许多优点,但仍有许多情况需要考虑肾造瘘管的放置。尽管如此,在PCNL后决定是否使用肾造口管还是要取决于外科医生的经验和临床判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号