首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearance with or without shock wave lithotripsy?
【24h】

Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearance with or without shock wave lithotripsy?

机译:在有或没有冲击波碎石的情况下,坦索罗辛是否能提高下输尿管结石清除率?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether alpha1-blockers have any impact on stone clearance in patients with lower ureteral stones who underwent either shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or were followed up with standard hydration, analgesics, and anti-inflammatory treatment. METHODS: A total of 78 patients (56 men and 22 women) who had lower ureteral stones located at the distal 5 cm of the ureter were divided into four groups. The first group consisted of 30 patients (38.5%) with stones less than 5 mm (range 3 to 5) who were randomly divided into two subgroups. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (19.2%) who were followed up with oral hydration and diclofenac sodium. Group 2 consisted of 15 patients (19.2%) who received tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily in addition to the standard regimens. The second two groups consisted of 48 patients (61.5%) with stones greater than 5 mm (range 6 to 15) who underwent SWL. These patients were also randomly divided between those who did not (group 3, n = 24) and those who did (group 4, n = 24) receive tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily. All patients were re-evaluated with plain abdominal x-rays and helical computed tomography 15 days after the beginning of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients, 36 (46.2%) became stone free. The stone-free rate was 20%, 53.3%, 33.3%, and 70.8% for group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The best results were achieved in those who underwent SWL plus tamsulosin treatment (group 4). The differences between the stone-free rates for groups 3 versus 4 (P = 0.019) and the tamsulosin versus control groups (P = 0.0015) were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tamsulosin to conventional treatment seemed beneficial in terms of stone clearance of lower ureteral stones, and this effect was more evident for larger stones, especially when combined with SWL.
机译:目的:评估α1受体阻滞剂是否对接受冲击波碎石术(SWL)或接受标准水合作用,镇痛药和抗炎治疗的输尿管下段结石患者的结石清除率有影响。方法:将总共78例患者(56例男性和22例女性)的输尿管下端结石位于输尿管远端5 cm处,分为四组。第一组包括30例(38.5%)结石小于5毫米(3到5)的患者,随机分为两个亚组。第1组由15名患者(19.2%)组成,他们接受了口服水合作用和双氯芬酸钠的随访。第2组由15例(19.2%)患者组成,他们除了接受标准治疗外,还接受坦索罗辛0.4 mg每天的治疗。后两组由48例行SWL的结石大于5毫米(范围6至15)的患者组成(61.5%)。这些患者还随机分为未接受(坦索罗辛)0.4 mg的患者(第3组,n = 24)和不接受坦索洛辛(第4组,n = 24)。开始治疗后15天,所有患者均经腹部平片X线和螺旋计算机断层扫描重新评估。结果:78例患者中,有36例(46.2%)无结石。第1、2、3和4组的无结石率分别为20%,53.3%,33.3%和70.8%。在接受SWL加坦洛新治疗的患者中取得了最佳结果(第4组)。第3组与第4组的无结石发生率(P = 0.019)以及坦索罗辛组与对照组的无结石率之间的差异(P = 0.0015)具有统计学意义。结论:常规治疗中添加坦索罗辛似乎对下输尿管结石的结石清除有好处,而且对于较大的结石,尤其是与SWL联合使用时,这种作用更为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号