【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most ureteral calculi can be managed by exttacorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or semirigid ureteroscopy. The trend has been to prefer ureteroscopy, because most patients will present with acute colic requiring insertion of a double-J stent. However, situations exist in which the transureteral approach could become very cumbersome, resulting in long operation times with the risk of ureteral injury. Such a scenario usually involves large, impacted ureteral stones. For such stones, laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy might present a viable option.2 Usually the operating times are significantly shorter, the stone can be removed, and the ureterotomy can be sutured. It should be emphasized that by 2013 laparoscopic suturing had become a standard procedure among urologic laparoscopists. Therefore, the authors should not claim the data by Gaur et al from the last century to justify the use of the da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) for this purpose.
机译:大多数输尿管结石可通过体外冲击波碎石术或半刚性输尿管镜进行处理。趋势是倾向于输尿管镜检查,因为大多数患者会出现急性绞痛,需要插入双J支架。然而,存在这样的情况,其中,经输尿管入路可能变得非常麻烦,导致手术时间长,并有输尿管损伤的风险。这种情况通常涉及大的,受影响的输尿管结石。对于此类结石,腹腔镜或腹腔镜后输尿管结石术可能是可行的选择。2通常,手术时间明显缩短,可以切除结石,并且可以缝合输尿管切开术。应该强调的是,到2013年,腹腔镜缝合已成为泌尿科腹腔镜医师的标准程序。因此,作者不应该要求Gaur等人提供上个世纪的数据来证明为此使用da Vinci系统(Intuitive Surgical,Sunnyvale,CA)是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号