首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Spouse ratings of quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer of lower socioeconomic status: an assessment of feasibility, reliability, and validity.
【24h】

Spouse ratings of quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer of lower socioeconomic status: an assessment of feasibility, reliability, and validity.

机译:社会经济地位较低的转移性前列腺癌患者的生活质量配偶评分:可行性,可靠性和有效性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and validity of spousal assessments by evaluating the collateral quality-of-life (QOL) ratings of patients of lower socioeconomic status with metastatic prostate cancer because collateral ratings provide supplemental information when advanced cancer limits patient self-report. METHODS: Patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer (n = 36) of lower socioeconomic status completed validated QOL instruments (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life-30, and Quality of Life Index). Spouses completed a modified FACT-G, and physicians rated performance status using Karnofsky's scale. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability was moderate to high for patient ratings on all FACT-G subscales and for spousal ratings on the modified FACT-G physical, functional, and emotional subscales. The spouses' ratings of the patients on the social and doctor relationship subscales were below the accepted criterion for a measure's use in group comparisons. The comparisons of the mean values of the FACT-G revealed agreement between patients and spouses, except that the spouses rated the patients as having poorer emotional function than did the patients. The intraclass correlations were moderate to high for the functional and emotional subscales and were low, but significant, for the physical and social subscales. The patient and spouse FACT-G ratings correlated with the patient ratings and physician ratings across the instruments for the functional and physical domains (r = 0.48 to 0.77, for patients; r = 0.31 to 0.70, for spouses), with less consistent relationships for the social and emotional domains. CONCLUSIONS: The collateral QOL assessments from spouses are potentially useful in assessing the functional status in patients of lower socioeconomic status with metastatic prostate cancer. For subjective domains, such as the social domain, direct patient assessments are needed.
机译:目的:通过评估具有较低社会经济地位的转移性前列腺癌患者的附带生活质量(QOL)评估,来评估配偶评估的可靠性和有效性,因为当晚期癌症限制患者的自我报告时,附带评估会提供补充信息。方法:具有较低社会经济地位的D2期前列腺癌(n = 36)患者已完成已验证的QOL工具(癌症治疗一般功能评估[FACT-G],欧洲癌症生活质量研究与治疗组织30,和生活质量指数)。配偶完成了修改后的FACT-G,医生使用Karnofsky量表对表现状态进行了评估。结果:对于所有FACT-G分量表的患者评分以及经修订的FACT-G身体,功能和情感分量表的配偶评分,内部一致性的信度为中等到高。配偶在社会和医生关系分量表上对患者的评分低于在小组比较中使用该度量的公认标准。 FACT-G平均值的比较揭示了患者与配偶之间的一致性,不同之处在于,配偶对患者的情感功能评价为比患者差。对于功能和情绪分量表,类内相关性为中到高,而对于身体和社会分量表,类内相关性为低但显着。患者和配偶的FACT-G评分与功能和物理领域的仪器的患者评分和医师评分相关(对于患者,r = 0.48至0.77;对于配偶,r = 0.31至0.70),而对于社会和情感领域。结论:来自配偶的附带QOL评估可能对评估转移性前列腺癌社会经济地位较低的患者的功能状态有用。对于主观领域,例如社交领域,需要直接的患者评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号